BPFK Member: Arnt Johansen: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This member presides over:


'''Checkpointed'''


# Inside ka: fill every logically present but syntactically absent place with ce'u.
* [[BPFK Section: lerfu Forming cmavo]]
* [[BPFK Section: Tense sumtcita]]


# Outside ka: fill every logically present but syntactically absent place with zo'e.
* [[BPFK Section: Quantity sumtcita]]


# (1-2) constitute the ONLY difference between ka and du'u (except for the x2 of du'u which, in usage at least, seems dead).
'''Done, ready to vote (according to arj)'''


** But the x2 of cusku is a sedu'u: ''mi cusku sedu'u la .and. srera''
* [[BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo]]
** "I am an expresser type of the sentence that says And errs"?? OK, only joshing. OK, maybe it does get used then. Doesn't deserve to, though :-(
* [[BPFK Section: Digits]]


--mi'e [[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]].
* [[BPFK Section: Linkargs]]
* [[BPFK Section: Evidentials]]


----
* [[BPFK Section: Compass Spatial]]
* [[BPFK Section: Discursives]]


Please let this [[jbocre: dies in the arse|die in the arse]]. (There, And, that better? :-) ) Under this proposal, ''ka ce'u klama'' means ''ka ce'u klama ce'u ce'u ce'u ce'u'' (or in fact, ''ka ce'u klama ce'u ce'u ce'u ce'u pi'o ce'u bai ce'u ni'a ce'u cazi ce'u fi'o ganxo ce'u...''). If I want to speak of going as a property of just the goer, I should not have to say ''ka ce'u klama zo'e zo'e zo'e zo'e''. The sensible default is not two ce'u, or a zillion ce'u, but a single ce'u.
* [[BPFK Section: Numeric Tense]]


-- [[User:Nick Nicholas|nitcion]]
'''Work in progress'''


----
* [[BPFK Section: Contact Spatial]]
* [[BPFK Section: Reference Regulators]]


I will let it die in the arse. You don't realize that ''du'u ce'u klama kei'' would express the property of goerhood, but it remains the case that under the above proposals there is no way that ''ka klama kei'' or ''du'u klama kei'' can express the property of goerhood. And that's what people want.
'''Assigned, but untouched'''


Therefore, see [[jbocre: ka, du'u, si'o, ce'u, zo'e|ka, du'u, si'o, ce'u, zo'e]] for a revised proposal.
See also: [[User:tsali|tsali]]
[[Category:BPFK member]]

Revision as of 16:43, 4 November 2013

This member presides over:

Checkpointed

Done, ready to vote (according to arj)

Work in progress

Assigned, but untouched

See also: tsali

Retrieved from "https://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=BPFK_Member:_Arnt_Johansen&oldid=74431"