Jump to navigation Jump to search
Consensus procedure addenda
Here are two unofficial but reasonable (clarifying) future addenda for handling CFC reviews.
- Maik: I would say, there must be one following ping when there is a revision [to the action under review], but not two more (i.e. you don't have to start the CFC all over again). The following ping must call attention to the fact that the action under review has been revised since the last ping.
- Aris: Makes sense.
- Maik: these pings could repeat several times if revisions keep getting made
- Aris: We could also move the period after the second ping to two days then. Giving members a minimum of two days to comment seems advisable.
- Maik: I would agree to that.