proposed interpretive conventions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Gleki moved page jbocre: Proposed interpretive conventions to Proposed interpretive conventions) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{jbocre/en}} | |||
Innumerably many syntactically well-formed structures in Lojban have no clearly-defined interpretation. This page lists unofficial proposals for useful or needful interpretive conventions for some of these cases. (Some of these proposed conventions might be natural and/or logical consequences of official interpretive conventions.) | Innumerably many syntactically well-formed structures in Lojban have no clearly-defined interpretation. This page lists unofficial proposals for useful or needful interpretive conventions for some of these cases. (Some of these proposed conventions might be natural and/or logical consequences of official interpretive conventions.) | ||
Revision as of 16:34, 24 January 2014
This page contains discussions of experimental/scientific/philosophical/logical aspects of Lojban that are non-official and not for everyday usage. You've been warned. |
Innumerably many syntactically well-formed structures in Lojban have no clearly-defined interpretation. This page lists unofficial proposals for useful or needful interpretive conventions for some of these cases. (Some of these proposed conventions might be natural and/or logical consequences of official interpretive conventions.)
Current proposals
- Not really a proposed interpretive convention, more a discussion of a convention already extant in the language (per The Book) and why it should be used more.
- pertaining to vo'a
- gadri and quantifiers
- concerning NU abstractions
- kau
- concerning numbers & mekso
- concerning tcita, tense & modals
Proposals that have died in the arse
- concerning NU abstractions
- asymmetric goi
- On the meaning of 'ro broda cu brode' (arsedead version)-