Difference between revisions of "obsolete experimental cmavo"

From Lojban
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
*Why isn't '''cu'u''' good enough? Isn't '''ciska''' a type of '''cusku?'''
 
*Why isn't '''cu'u''' good enough? Isn't '''ciska''' a type of '''cusku?'''
 
{{cmavo|fai'i|FA|Function similar to '''fai'''. [[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]]}}
 
{{cmavo|fai'i|FA|Function similar to '''fai'''. [[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]]}}
 
+
{{cmavo|jai'i|SE|Function similar to '''jai'''. [[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]]}}
;'''[[jai'i|jai'i]]''' [[SE|SE]] :Function similar to ''jai''. [[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]]
+
{{cmavo|ki'i'o|KI|Synonym for '''ki'''}}
 
+
{{cmavo|sa'ai|SA|next word begins nonstandard construction.: (Hopefully this stops the sentence from being parsed.): (proposed by but not endorsed by AndR)}}
----
+
{{cmavo|xa'a|XAhA|abstract to concrete converter: converts abstractions into concrete sumti, inverse of '''tu'a'''}}
 
+
*Doesnt le su'u do what you want?
;'''[[ki'i'o|ki'i'o]]''' [[KI|KI]]: Synonym for {ki}
+
**[[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]]:
 
+
*** I've no idea. Go read the messages where Djer proposed it.
----
+
{{cmavo|xe'e1|PA|any}}
 
 
;'''[[sa'ai|sa'ai]]''' [[SA|SA]] next word begins nonstandard construction.: (Hopefully this stops the sentence from being parsed.): (proposed by but not endorsed by AndR)
 
 
 
----
 
 
 
;'''[[xa'a|xa'a]]''' [[XAhA|XAhA]] abstract to concrete converter: converts abstractions into concrete sumti, inverse of [[tu'a|tu'a]]
 
 
 
''Doesnt le su'u do what you want?''
 
 
 
* I've no idea. Go read the messages where Djer proposed it. --mi'e And.
 
 
 
----
 
 
 
;'''[[xe'e1]]''' [[PA|PA]] any:
 
 
 
----
 
  
 
;'''[[xi'i3]]''' [[XI|XI]] degree of [[Fuzzy Logic|Fuzzy Logic]] truth:
 
;'''[[xi'i3]]''' [[XI|XI]] degree of [[Fuzzy Logic|Fuzzy Logic]] truth:

Revision as of 15:15, 29 June 2018

cau'e [COI] particle: vocative: comforting noise made toward infants (suggested by Jordan DeLong)
  • And Rosta think ki'ai + some appropriate sound would be more appropriate here, in that it it is a solution that generalizes to other quasi-vocatives.
ci'a [BAI] particle: as written by: ciska modal, 1st place, as written by source
  • Why isn't cu'u good enough? Isn't ciska a type of cusku?
fai'i [FA] particle: Function similar to fai. And Rosta
jai'i [SE] particle: Function similar to jai. And Rosta
ki'i'o [KI] particle: Synonym for ki
sa'ai [SA] particle: next word begins nonstandard construction.: (Hopefully this stops the sentence from being parsed.): (proposed by but not endorsed by AndR)
xa'a [XAhA] particle: abstract to concrete converter: converts abstractions into concrete sumti, inverse of tu'a
  • Doesnt le su'u do what you want?
    • And Rosta:
      • I've no idea. Go read the messages where Djer proposed it.
xe'e1 [PA] particle: any
xi'i3 XI degree of Fuzzy Logic truth

I think they also call this jei


xoi ROI
means the same as JAhA + CAI a'axi, discovered in he book after I ((xod) invented xoi.

xoi2 oi ???
abbreviation for lo'e du'u or conceivably tu'o su'u
  • Moved to Obsolete Experimental Cmavo because it is incompatible with the baseline. --And Rosta

xo'o XOhU
means the same as xe'enai

You really want to fill up x-cmavo space don't you? What is wrong with xe'enai or na xe'e?


xo'u XOhU high scope mark
marks the following word as going to the start of the prenex at the start of the sentence. xe'enai, conversely, notes that the following word does not got to the start of the prenex.

But what might actually be useful is a way to start a prenex at some place else in the sentence, resembling the English usage of listing undefined variables in a sentence and ending with a clause that says "where x=5 and r=2.3".


xu'u LUhU xa'a1 terminator

zi'oi SE
indicates that one or more argument places are annulled.: (proposed by AndR.)