obsolete experimental cmavo

From Lojban
Revision as of 15:09, 29 June 2018 by Gleki (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
cau'e [COI] particle: vocative: comforting noise made toward infants (suggested by Jordan DeLong)
  • And Rosta think ki'ai + some appropriate sound would be more appropriate here, in that it it is a solution that generalizes to other quasi-vocatives.
ci'a [BAI] particle: as written by: ciska modal, 1st place, as written by source
  • Why isn't cu'u good enough? Isn't ciska a type of cusku?
fai'i [FA] particle: Function similar to fai. And Rosta
jai'i SE
Function similar to jai. And Rosta

ki'i'o KI
Synonym for {ki}

sa'ai SA next word begins nonstandard construction.
(Hopefully this stops the sentence from being parsed.): (proposed by but not endorsed by AndR)

xa'a XAhA abstract to concrete converter
converts abstractions into concrete sumti, inverse of tu'a

Doesnt le su'u do what you want?

  • I've no idea. Go read the messages where Djer proposed it. --mi'e And.

xe'e1 PA any

xi'i3 XI degree of Fuzzy Logic truth

I think they also call this jei

xoi ROI
means the same as JAhA + CAI a'axi, discovered in he book after I ((xod) invented xoi.

xoi2 oi ???
abbreviation for lo'e du'u or conceivably tu'o su'u
  • Moved to Obsolete Experimental Cmavo because it is incompatible with the baseline. --And Rosta

xo'o XOhU
means the same as xe'enai

You really want to fill up x-cmavo space don't you? What is wrong with xe'enai or na xe'e?

xo'u XOhU high scope mark
marks the following word as going to the start of the prenex at the start of the sentence. xe'enai, conversely, notes that the following word does not got to the start of the prenex.

But what might actually be useful is a way to start a prenex at some place else in the sentence, resembling the English usage of listing undefined variables in a sentence and ending with a clause that says "where x=5 and r=2.3".

xu'u LUhU xa'a1 terminator

zi'oi SE
indicates that one or more argument places are annulled.: (proposed by AndR.)