kai'i: Difference between revisions
m (Gleki moved page jbocre: kai'i to kai'i without leaving a redirect: Text replace - "jbocre: k" to "k") |
m (Text replace - "jbocre: p" to "p") |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[jbocre: mi'e [jbocre: And|And]] | [[jbocre: mi'e [jbocre: And|And]] | ||
Superseded by ''[[ | Superseded by ''[[poi'i|poi'i]]''. | ||
Speculatively proposed in [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/9301], repeated here: | Speculatively proposed in [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/9301], repeated here: |
Revision as of 12:14, 23 March 2014
[[jbocre: mi'e [jbocre: And|And]]
Superseded by poi'i.
Speculatively proposed in [1], repeated here:
Recent distinct threads have established
(a) that {ka} is redundant, since {du'u} can serve all the
functions of current {ka}
(b) that there is a need to be able to define reflexive
selbri that can function as sumti tails, analgously to
{da noi ke'a ke'a lumci} = "something that *self-washes*".
I first propose a NU, {kai'i}, meaning "ckaji (be le ka)".
Then
da noi ke'a ke'a lumci
= lo kai'i ce'u ce'u lumci
= lo ckaji be tu'o du'u ce'u ce'u lumci
And more generally:
lo broda
= da noi ke'a broda
= lo kai'i ce'u broda
= lo ckaji be tu'o du'u ce'u broda
da noi mi djuno tu'o du'u ke'a broda
= lo kai'i mi djuno tu'o du'u ce'u broda
= lo ckaji be tu'o du'u mi djuno tu'o du'u ce'u broda
I secondly propose that {ka} could be redefined as equivalent to
{kai'i}.