Hangul: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Vowels) |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Vowels == | == Vowels == | ||
{|class='wikitable' |- |a |ㅏ |- |e |ㅔ |- |i |ㅣ |- |o |ㅗ |- |u |ㅜ |} | |||
a ㅏ | |||
e ㅔ | |||
i ㅣ | |||
o ㅗ | |||
u ㅜ | |||
*The falling dipthongs are a problem, because there's no '''ii''' or '''uu'''. So is '''y'''. | *The falling dipthongs are a problem, because there's no '''ii''' or '''uu'''. So is '''y'''. |
Revision as of 07:36, 16 June 2019
Hangul orthography for Lojban.
Discussion
General notes
- Lee Min-Ji:
- Obviously Hangul is unsuited to be a Lojban orthography, but it does pose an interesting challenge.
- Does anyone know about IKPA : Internationnal Korean Phonetic Alphabet ? Look at this. It can almost replace IPA, and certainly display all the lojban phonetic diversity.
- But we seem to lost the syllabic bloc feature, and that's I think where a work can be done to restore it, although IKPA wasn't though to be used this way.
- la brabenvaxda'u balsoi:
- I'm sure it is closer to a proper logic writing system for a logic language than every attempt ever made. Pei'pei
- A Hangul orthography is sheer foolishness, because Hangul doesn't work well for most languages except Korean.
- sanxiyn.:
- You're right in this, pe'i
- sanxiyn.:
Vowels
- The falling dipthongs are a problem, because there's no ii or uu. So is y.
- pne:
- What about ㅡ for y?
- sanxiyn:
- No. y is exact match of ㅓ.
- pne:
Consonants
- There is no character for initial b, c, d, g, j, l or z, though some characters that are used for sounds sot found in Lojban can be used for these purposes, like the "iu" series or the "ssang" series.
- sanxiyn.:
- Same is true for English, but there is nonetheless Korean orthography for it. Maybe we can imitate it.
- Also, it will be hard to fit in the . or the ' if it occurs in a syllable.
- sanxiyn.:
- Apostrophe ' must be ㅎ pe'i
- sanxiyn.:
- sanxiyn.: