Talk:facing the forest
I don't think the x2 of mlana means what you think it means.
x2 is something that x1 is to the side of, not the thing it's a part of which it is the side part of.
Perhaps we need a mlana pagbu lujvo?
-Robin
> Re: facing the forest > I don't think the x2 of mlana means what you think it means. > > x2 is something that x1 is to the side of, not the thing it's a part of which > it is the side part of. > > Perhaps we need a mlana pagbu lujvo?
In principle {mlana} can be either. The same happens with all the other spatial relationship words, although the wording of the definitions is not always as clear as could be. {cnita} for example has a note: "also underside". A lujvo with {pagbu} won't hurt though. mlapau: x1 pagbu x2 gi'e mlana x2 x3 x4
mu'o mi'e xorxes
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''__ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 05:23:26AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > > Re: facing the forest I don't think the x2 of mlana means what > > you think it means. > > > > x2 is something that x1 is to the side of, not the thing it's a > > part of which it is the side part of. > > > > Perhaps we need a mlana pagbu lujvo? > > In principle {mlana} can be either. The same happens with all the > other spatial relationship words, although the wording of the > definitions is not always as clear as could be. {cnita} for > example has a note: "also underside". A lujvo with {pagbu} won't > hurt though. mlapau: x1 pagbu x2 gi'e mlana x2 x3 x4
Done. In English, anyways.
-Robin