ci'irprosa: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "{BOX()} " to "")
 
m (Gleki moved page jbocre: ci'irprosa to ci'irprosa without leaving a redirect: Text replace - "jbocre: c" to "c")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


== Proposed Definitions of KOhA4, KOhA5, KOhA6 ==
<pre>


''ci'irprosa levi pemci cukta vau''


=== ko'a, ko'e, ko'i, ko'o, ko'u, fo'a, fo'e, fo'i, fo'o, fo'u (KOhA4) ===
--Preface to this poembook--


==== Proposed definition  ====
''fu'e.a'a ca'e lu lo velsku mo leri selsku li'u''


These are assignable pro-sumti. The referent of each word can be assigned using {goi}.
How does the means-of-expression relate to its things-expressed?


==== Proposed keyword ====
''.i ru'a la lojban. teryro'i co danfu fo di'u''


* ko'a: it-1
I assume Lojban is a means of trying to answer that question.
* ko'e: it-2


* ko'i: it-3
''.i rixire cizra mu'i .iki'uku ri mi cinri po'ita'i lenu lo''
* ko'o: it-4


* ko'u: it-5
Thus it is strange; &amp; it therefore interests me, as a blackbird
* fo'a: it-6


* fo'e: it-7
''xekcpi cuse trina loi minra ni'o sera'a le me la sapir .uorf.''
* fo'i: it-8


* fo'o: it-9
is drawn to shiny things. As for the "Sapir-Whorf" hypothesis,
* fo'u: it-10


==== Examples ====
''kuku pe'i ri ge narvai kaurjetnu gi dutcumki selcipra .iku'i''


;i le nanmu goi ko'a cu klama le zarci .i ko'a viska re nanmu goi ko'e joi ko'i .i ko'e joi ko'i ca casnu le jdima be le cipni :A man went to the market. He saw two men there. They were discussing the price of the birds.
it seems to me both a truism &amp; impossible to prove. It might be


{BOX}
''pe'icu'i rolo pemci fasnu cu danfu po'a fo lu ba'e lemi velsku mo''


said, however, that each poem-event is like an answer to the


=== vo'a, vo'e, vo'i, vo'o, vo'u (KOhA4) ===
''levi ba'e bazi selsku li'u .ije ni'iku lezu'o pemci zbasu kei''


==== Proposed definition ====
question, "How does MY means-of-expression relate to this NEXT


These are pro-sumti that refer to sumti in the outermost bridi of the sentence. Each of the series refers to a difference place<br />
''mo'u bau la lojban. ka'e tadji lenu cipra satcyzga kei be leri''


vo'a - The x1 of this bridi.<br />
thing-expressed?" Then poetry in Lojban would be a way of


vo'e - The x2 of this bridi.<br />
''selsku ka cumki .ifu'o ku'i mi nabona'e milxe selsrana le sabji''


vo'i - The x3 of this bridi.<br />
experimentally examining its expressive range... But i am not


vo'o - The x4 of this bridi.<br />
''be loinu skekrinu kei be le cuntu poi rincau caircni ku be'unai''


vo'u - The x5 of this bridi.<br />
overly concerned with providing scientific reasons for so fascin-


==== Proposed keywords ====
''.i .a'oo'acu'i lemi ka gersne kei bana cfipyspo le canko bismo'a''


* vo'a: it-x1
ating an activity in itself. I only hope the imperfections of my
* vo'e: it-x2


* vo'i: it-x3
''po'a pe lemi mukti mu'o''
* vo'o: it-x4


* vo'u: it-x5
usage do not obliterate the "window ice-pattern" of my intent.


==== Examples ====
</pre>


;.i la risna noltruni'u cu zutse le vo'a nolstizu :The Queen of Hearts sat on her throne.
4/19/91-5/13/91
 
==== Issues ====
 
The '''vo'a'''-series cmavo refer to the sumti of the ''outermost'' bridi of the sentence. (This was left unspecified in CLL, and decided by a significant majority of usage.)
 
{BOX}
 
 
===  ri, ra, ru (KOhA5) ===
 
==== Proposed definition ====
 
These pro-sumti repeat previous sumti in the sentence. ri repeats the previous sumti. ra repeats a recent, but usually not the previous, sumti. And ru repeats an earlier sumti, to be determined from context.
 
==== Proposed keywords ====
 
* ri: last sumti
* ra: recent sumti
 
* ru: earlier sumti
 
==== Examples ====
 
;.i ji'a la lutcezis zo'u ri na kakne le nu ficyju'o la ceris la amonti,ados :And as for Luchesi, he cannot distinguish Sherry from Amontillado.
 
;.i ca lenu la gregor.samsas. co'a cikna gi'e co'u raktu senva vau ca lo cerni kei ra facki lenu ra vi le ckana ba'o binxo lo brabra cinki :As Gregor Samsa awoke one morning from uneasy dreams he found himself in his bed transformed into a gigantic insect.
 
;.i mi kucli ledu'u makau frica le xe fanva be ri le xe fanva be ru :I'm curious as to what differs from the translation of that and the translation of the thing you said a bit ago.
 
{BOX}
 
 
=== ti, ta, tu (KOhA6) ===
 
==== Proposed definition ====
 
These pro-sumti are demonstratives. They refer to objects in the real world. ti refers to an object near the speaker; "this here object". ta refers to an object near the listener, or if the listener is near the speaker it refers to an object a medium distance away; "that there object". tu refers to a distant object, or one far from both the speaker and the listener; "that yonder object".
 
==== Proposed keywords ====
 
* ti: this here
* ta: that there
 
* tu: that yonder
 
==== Examples ====
 
;ti joncku lei cafne preti be la lojban :This here is a collective FAQs of Lojban.
 
;doi ksion go'i .i ta cnino traji :Hey Xion, yeah. That thing near you is the most new.
 
;tu cukta lo pixra be lo nalgasnu ninmu :That over there is a book containing pictures of females not really doing anything.
 
{BOX}
 
== Bickerings ==
 
[http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/browse_thread/thread/0b207b268a238050 his] about ri/vo'a (+ soi)

Latest revision as of 11:49, 23 March 2014

''ci'irprosa levi pemci cukta vau''

--Preface to this poembook--

''fu'e.a'a ca'e lu lo velsku mo leri selsku li'u''

How does the means-of-expression relate to its things-expressed?

''.i ru'a la lojban. teryro'i co danfu fo di'u''

I assume Lojban is a means of trying to answer that question.

''.i rixire cizra mu'i .iki'uku ri mi cinri po'ita'i lenu lo''

Thus it is strange; & it therefore interests me, as a blackbird

''xekcpi cuse trina loi minra ni'o sera'a le me la sapir .uorf.''

is drawn to shiny things. As for the "Sapir-Whorf" hypothesis,

''kuku pe'i ri ge narvai kaurjetnu gi dutcumki selcipra .iku'i''

it seems to me both a truism & impossible to prove. It might be

''pe'icu'i rolo pemci fasnu cu danfu po'a fo lu ba'e lemi velsku mo''

said, however, that each poem-event is like an answer to the

''levi ba'e bazi selsku li'u .ije ni'iku lezu'o pemci zbasu kei''

question, "How does MY means-of-expression relate to this NEXT

''mo'u bau la lojban. ka'e tadji lenu cipra satcyzga kei be leri''

thing-expressed?" Then poetry in Lojban would be a way of

''selsku ka cumki .ifu'o ku'i mi nabona'e milxe selsrana le sabji''

experimentally examining its expressive range... But i am not

''be loinu skekrinu kei be le cuntu poi rincau caircni ku be'unai''

overly concerned with providing scientific reasons for so fascin-

''.i .a'oo'acu'i lemi ka gersne kei bana cfipyspo le canko bismo'a''

ating an activity in itself. I only hope the imperfections of my

''po'a pe lemi mukti mu'o''

usage do not obliterate the "window ice-pattern" of my intent.

4/19/91-5/13/91