Vagueness and ambiguity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "thumb|right Discourse is said to be ambiguous when it encompasses potentially disjoint regions of concept-space (circles 1 and 2 are separate...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:re_smuni_i_pa_smuni.png|thumb|right]] | {{se inspekte/en}}[[Image:re_smuni_i_pa_smuni.png|thumb|right|Ambiguous discourse (upper row, circles 1 and 2 are separate) and vague discourse (lower row, one polymorphic form is not disjoint).]] | ||
Discourse is said to be ambiguous when it encompasses potentially disjoint regions of concept-space | Discourse is said to be ''ambiguous'' when it encompasses potentially disjoint regions of concept-space. | ||
Discourse is said to be vague if it encompasses a large but contiguous region of concept-space | Discourse is said to be ''vague'' if it encompasses a large but contiguous region of concept-space. | ||
''Syntactic ambiguity'' is a situation where a sentence may be interpreted in more than one way due to ambiguous sentence structure. Lojban doesn't have syntactic ambiguity. | |||
==See also== | |||
*[[Ambiguous sentences in English]] | |||
==Resources== | |||
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_ambiguity | |||
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_path_sentence | |||
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/That_that_is_is_that_that_is_not_is_not_is_that_it_it_is | |||
Latest revision as of 09:03, 17 March 2015
 | The formatting of this page has been checked for following the guidelines of le uitki. |
Discourse is said to be ambiguous when it encompasses potentially disjoint regions of concept-space.
Discourse is said to be vague if it encompasses a large but contiguous region of concept-space.
Syntactic ambiguity is a situation where a sentence may be interpreted in more than one way due to ambiguous sentence structure. Lojban doesn't have syntactic ambiguity.