Talk:Tiki forum archive/Forum 5/9547

Source: 2013 Tiki forum 5, thread #9547. Original authors, UTC times, post IDs, and reply-parent IDs are preserved. This is an archive, not an active article discussion.

Source Code

Source Code

lukebergen · 2010-02-04 11:37 UTC · Tiki post #9547

In the future David, it would probably be best if you replied to

[email protected] (the mailing list) instead of to all the individuals who have replied at one point or another in the thread.

Haven't had a chance to look at your code yet but I look forward to it! :)

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:47 AM, David Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here's the source code of the program, pass it to anyone that would be > interested.

>

Source Code

winkerbean · 2010-02-04 11:41 UTC · Tiki post #9549 · reply to Tiki post #9547

Also, for some reason, (I think) g-mail made the attachment text instead

(inserted in the body of the e-mail itself). I would like to try it out but, I hope understandably, am having some trouble as a result.

On 2 February 2010 00:50, Luke Bergen <[email protected]> wrote:

> In the future David, it would probably be best if you replied to > [email protected] (the mailing list) instead of to all the > individuals who have replied at one point or another in the thread. > > Haven't had a chance to look at your code yet but I look forward to it! :) > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:47 AM, David Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Here's the source code of the program, pass it to anyone that would be >> interested. >> >

>

Source Code

baisong · 2010-02-04 11:41 UTC · Tiki post #9550 · reply to Tiki post #9547

i got garbled text as well:

--001636283dce31f8b4047e97a69b Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="GPAICC.rar" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="GPAICC.rar" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_g55g0gtj0

UmFyIRoHAM+QcwAADQAAAAAAAABwfXRAkEUAnwAAAOgAAAAC9TPbQDpKPjwdMyAAIAAAAEdQQUlD QyBVc2VyIEludGVyZmFjZVwuY2xhc3NwYXRoAPA5RVgJlRjMvhE3KDweE3sq63RFoiVBdFQpXclZ IWxayQklRe9oiCL/Qqoi6V4RmYeMzORYZr8HvaPtX3Ciw8N1It6GuStWEd8l4YkKMs6VT9tply3c A4cVy2U1MznMmfRYy18aC3t4i2g0/NzT... ...(about 36 pagefuls more)...

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 22:42, Frank <[email protected]> wrote:

> Also, for some reason, (I think) g-mail made the attachment text instead > (inserted in the body of the e-mail itself). I would like to try it out > but, I hope understandably, am having some trouble as a result. > > > On 2 February 2010 00:50, Luke Bergen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In the future David, it would probably be best if you replied to >> [email protected] (the mailing list) instead of to all the >> individuals who have replied at one point or another in the thread. >> >> Haven't had a chance to look at your code yet but I look forward to it! :) >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:47 AM, David Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Here's the source code of the program, pass it to anyone that would be >>> interested. >>> >> >>

>

Source Code

baisong · 2010-02-04 11:41 UTC · Tiki post #9551 · reply to Tiki post #9547

actually, i'm kind of intrigued, if i cut and paste the huge block of text

into a text editor, remove all line-breaks and rename it to a .rar file, will I just be wasting my time? =p

2010/2/2 Oren <[email protected]>

> i got garbled text as well: > > --001636283dce31f8b4047e97a69b > Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="GPAICC.rar" > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="GPAICC.rar" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > X-Attachment-Id: f_g55g0gtj0 > > > UmFyIRoHAM+QcwAADQAAAAAAAABwfXRAkEUAnwAAAOgAAAAC9TPbQDpKPjwdMyAAIAAAAEdQQUlD > > QyBVc2VyIEludGVyZmFjZVwuY2xhc3NwYXRoAPA5RVgJlRjMvhE3KDweE3sq63RFoiVBdFQpXclZ > > IWxayQklRe9oiCL/Qqoi6V4RmYeMzORYZr8HvaPtX3Ciw8N1It6GuStWEd8l4YkKMs6VT9tply3c > A4cVy2U1MznMmfRYy18aC3t4i2g0/NzT... > ...(about 36 pagefuls more)... > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 22:42, Frank <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Also, for some reason, (I think) g-mail made the attachment text instead >> (inserted in the body of the e-mail itself). I would like to try it out >> but, I hope understandably, am having some trouble as a result. >> >> >> On 2 February 2010 00:50, Luke Bergen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> In the future David, it would probably be best if you replied to >>> [email protected] (the mailing list) instead of to all the >>> individuals who have replied at one point or another in the thread. >>> >>> Haven't had a chance to look at your code yet but I look forward to it! >>> :) >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:47 AM, David Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Here's the source code of the program, pass it to anyone that would be >>>> interested. >>>> >>> >>> >>

>

Source Code

kozmikreis · 2010-02-04 11:41 UTC · Tiki post #9552 · reply to Tiki post #9547

Tou could try running it through a base-64 decrypter, that appears to

be the format, and there're a few JavaScript implementations out there, try a Google search :-)

kozmikreis

-- Sent from my iPhone

On 2 Feb 2010, at 14:51, Oren <[email protected]> wrote:

> actually, i'm kind of intrigued, if i cut and paste the huge block > of text into a text editor, remove all line-breaks and rename it to > a .rar file, will I just be wasting my time? =p > > 2010/2/2 Oren <[email protected]> > i got garbled text as well: > > --001636283dce31f8b4047e97a69b > Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="GPAICC.rar" > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="GPAICC.rar" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > X-Attachment-Id: f_g55g0gtj0 > > UmFyIRoHAM > +QcwAADQAAAAAAAABwfXRAkEUAnwAAAOgAAAAC9TPbQDpKPjwdMyAAIAAAAEdQQUlD > QyBVc2VyIEludGVyZmFjZVwuY2xhc3NwYXRoAPA5RVgJlRjMvhE3KDweE3sq63RFoiVBdFQpXclZ

> IWxayQklRe9oiCL/ > Qqoi6V4RmYeMzORYZr8HvaPtX3Ciw8N1It6GuStWEd8l4YkKMs6VT9tply3c > A4cVy2U1MznMmfRYy18aC3t4i2g0/NzT... > ...(about 36 pagefuls more)... > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 22:42, Frank <[email protected]> wrote: > Also, for some reason, (I think) g-mail made the attachment text > instead (inserted in the body of the e-mail itself). I would like > to try it out but, I hope understandably, am having some trouble as > a result. > > > On 2 February 2010 00:50, Luke Bergen <[email protected]> wrote: > In the future David, it would probably be best if you replied to [email protected] > (the mailing list) instead of to all the individuals who have > replied at one point or another in the thread. > > Haven't had a chance to look at your code yet but I look forward to > it! :) > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:47 AM, David Zhang <[email protected]> > wrote: > Here's the source code of the program, pass it to anyone that would be > interested. > > >

>

Source Code

kozmikreis · 2010-02-04 11:41 UTC · Tiki post #9553 · reply to Tiki post #9547

Oh sorry, yes the result would be a binary .rar which JS in a webpage

wouldn't be able to handle...

kozmikreis

-- Sent from my iPhone

On 2 Feb 2010, at 14:51, Oren <[email protected]> wrote:

> actually, i'm kind of intrigued, if i cut and paste the huge block > of text into a text editor, remove all line-breaks and rename it to > a .rar file, will I just be wasting my time? =p > > 2010/2/2 Oren <[email protected]> > i got garbled text as well: > > --001636283dce31f8b4047e97a69b > Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="GPAICC.rar" > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="GPAICC.rar" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > X-Attachment-Id: f_g55g0gtj0 > > UmFyIRoHAM > +QcwAADQAAAAAAAABwfXRAkEUAnwAAAOgAAAAC9TPbQDpKPjwdMyAAIAAAAEdQQUlD > QyBVc2VyIEludGVyZmFjZVwuY2xhc3NwYXRoAPA5RVgJlRjMvhE3KDweE3sq63RFoiVBdFQpXclZ

> IWxayQklRe9oiCL/ > Qqoi6V4RmYeMzORYZr8HvaPtX3Ciw8N1It6GuStWEd8l4YkKMs6VT9tply3c > A4cVy2U1MznMmfRYy18aC3t4i2g0/NzT... > ...(about 36 pagefuls more)... > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 22:42, Frank <[email protected]> wrote: > Also, for some reason, (I think) g-mail made the attachment text > instead (inserted in the body of the e-mail itself). I would like > to try it out but, I hope understandably, am having some trouble as > a result. > > > On 2 February 2010 00:50, Luke Bergen <[email protected]> wrote: > In the future David, it would probably be best if you replied to [email protected] > (the mailing list) instead of to all the individuals who have > replied at one point or another in the thread. > > Haven't had a chance to look at your code yet but I look forward to > it! :) > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:47 AM, David Zhang <[email protected]> > wrote: > Here's the source code of the program, pass it to anyone that would be > interested. > > >

>