Talk:Tiki forum archive/Forum 5/9312
Source: 2013 Tiki forum 5, thread #9312. Original authors, UTC times, post IDs, and reply-parent IDs are preserved. This is an archive, not an active article discussion.
tagged termsets
tagged termsets
lagejyspa · 2009-12-17 15:44 UTC · Tiki post #9312
Totus asked about the following at the end of [Esther] chapter 3
ciska tetai piro se mi'esku be la xaMAN. bei ge le turni pe le nolraitru ge'u .e le viptru vu'o poi turni ro selje'a ku'o gi le nobli be ro natmi be'o nu'i ge tecu'u ro selje'a sepi'o lo selyle'u pe ri gi tecu'u ro natmi bau lo bangu be ri
"Shouldn't there be a {nu'u} in front of {gi}? (CLL Chapter 14, example 11..7)"
I wasn't really sure. He may very well be right. Both parse, but I'm not sure exactly the difference is semantically (and jbofi'e doesn't handle tagged termsets), so I was wondering if some kind jbocre can help us out here?
So, anyone willing to answer? It came up again,
--gejyspa
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
tagged termsets
Minimiscience · 2009-12-17 16:06 UTC · Tiki post #9315 · reply to Tiki post #9312
skamyxatra. > Totus asked about the following at the end of [Esther] chapter 3 ... > So, anyone willing to answer? It came up again .skamyxatra
This was already answered when you asked about this on the WikiDiscuss mailing list two months ago. Since I'm not sure how to link to that list's archives, here are the responses that were given:
Jorge: > "Tagged termsets" or "tagged-term sets"? The former are not grammatical. > > Anyway, "nu'u" makes no difference, it's an elidable terminator, and > there are two of them, one for each termset: > > nu'i ge tecu'u ro selje'a sepi'o lo selyle'u pe ri [nu'u] gi tecu'u > ro natmi bau lo bangu be ri [nu'u]
You replied: > But why then does the CLL not mark the first nu'u as elidible in the > example cited by Andrew? I assumed that the scoping was somehow > different between the two versions.
Jorge replied: > I assume it's just a typo. In fact the first "nu'u" is more elidable > than the second, because "gi" itself always shows the end of the first > termset.
Do you still have any questions?
mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun.
-- ko na xalni
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
tagged termsets
lagejyspa · 2009-12-17 16:13 UTC · Tiki post #9316 · reply to Tiki post #9312
> de'i li 17 pi'e 12 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Michael Turniansky .fy. cusku zoi > skamyxatra. >> Totus asked about the following at the end of [Esther] chapter 3 > ... >> So, anyone willing to answer? It came up again > .skamyxatra > > This was already answered when you asked about this on the WikiDiscuss mailing > list two months ago. Since I'm not sure how to link to that list's archives, > here are the responses that were given: > > Jorge: >> "Tagged termsets" or "tagged-term sets"? The former are not grammatical. >> >> Anyway, "nu'u" makes no difference, it's an elidable terminator, and >> there are two of them, one for each termset: >> >> nu'i ge tecu'u ro selje'a sepi'o lo selyle'u pe ri [nu'u] gi tecu'u >> ro natmi bau lo bangu be ri [nu'u] > > You replied: >> But why then does the CLL not mark the first nu'u as elidible in the >> example cited by Andrew? I assumed that the scoping was somehow >> different between the two versions. > > Jorge replied: >> I assume it's just a typo. In fact the first "nu'u" is more elidable >> than the second, because "gi" itself always shows the end of the first >> termset. > > Do you still have any questions? > > mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun. > > -- > ko na xalni >
Weird, I THOUGHT it had been answered, but I cou;dn't find the
answer.. thanks -gy
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
