Talk:Tiki forum archive/Forum 1/3645

From Lojban

Source: 2013 Tiki forum 1, thread #3645. Original authors, UTC times, post IDs, and reply-parent IDs are preserved. This is an archive, not an active article discussion.

[[email protected]: NOT SURE]

[[email protected]: NOT SURE]

xorxes · 2005-01-12 02:20 UTC · Tiki post #3645

> Do you concur?

We are accepting these, because we accept y after any CVC rafsi, not only when it is required:

> vaxyselnandu -- BAD (should be vaxselnandu) > retysku -- BAD > mutyminji -- BAD > rixyflo -- BAD > cakyrepsa -- BAD (tricky! He meant {cakyrespa} which is valid. But "ps" is > not > a valid initial pair, so the 'y' is not needed.) > lojybadna -- BAD > rapykla -- BAD > sezygletu -- BAD > famygau -- BAD > gusypi'a -- BAD > macypre -- BAD > nandykaio -- BAD > pezydjine -- BAD > titynanba -- BAD


These we don't accept, but as I said, the restriction on admissible vowel pairs could be relaxed if we wanted to, as long as we use the same rule for cmene, cmavo and fu'ivla:

> daed -- NOT SURE (judgment call on comma) > skamrmouse -- NOT SURE (but skamrmo,use is valid) > nu,york -- NOT SURE (but he certainly didn't mean nu,y,ork, which is valid) > saying -- NOT SURE (sa,y,ing is valid) > meant -- NOT SURE (comma) > pleasant -- NOT SURE (comma) > unpleasant -- NOT SURE

This one should be BAD, {gx} is voiced-unvoiced:

> gugxrusko -- GOOD

We don't accept digits in fu'ivla currently. That could be changed:

> Elrond42 -- huh?? ({elrondvore} is a valid fu'ivla, but I don't know how he > meant to pronounce {Elrond42})

mu'o mi'e xorxes




__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!

http://my.yahoo.com