Talk:Lojval

Archived Tiki forum discussion for Lojval. Original authors, UTC times, and post IDs are retained below.

Lojval (Tiki thread #6490)

Aw: Lojval error with Pauker [FIX included]

namor · 2008-05-10 21:35 UTC · Tiki post #6491 (reply to #6490)

The script doesn't find words you already learned in the Pauker-Vocabulary-File, so it adds them again as unlearned. :-\

(This is because the Pauker Software adds a timestamp when the Voc. has been learned, so the 'stupid search routine' doesn't recognize the Voc. anymore as the one we've just searched for.)

I made a rather dirty fix on this.:

simply replace (line 163 or so): [CODE]

               if card_search_term in lojbancards:
                   print "\nThat card is already in your flashcard deck."
                   return

[/CODE]with:[CODE]

card_search_term = """%s

       %s
       
     
   """ % (front, back)

               if card_search_term in lojbancards:
                   print "\nThat card is already in your flashcard deck."
                   return

[/CODE]

As you can see, this simply doesn't search for the first line of the xml-entry, which contains the timestamp. Quick and dirty, but it works. :-)

Best regards, namor

> Use this thread to discuss the page:: Lojval

Aw: File uploaded

namor · 2008-05-10 21:53 UTC · Tiki post #6492 (reply to #6490)

Apparently the listserver ate most of the inline fix,

so I uploaded the fixed lojval.py file to the wiki.

Best regards, Namor

> Use this thread to discuss the page:: Lojval

Lojval

namor · 2008-05-11 07:25 UTC · Tiki post #6494 (reply to #6490)

Apparently the listserver ate most of the inline fix,

so I uploaded the fixed lojval.py file to the wiki.

Best regards, Namor

Am Samstag 10 Mai 2008 23:35:27 schrieb namor: > Aw: Lojval error with Pauker [FIX included] > > Author: namor > > The script doesn't find words you already learned in the > Pauker-Vocabulary-File, so it adds them again as unlearned. :-\ (This is > because the Pauker Software adds a timestamp when the Voc. has been > learned, so the 'stupid search routine' doesn't recognize the Voc. anymore > as the one we've just searched for.) > > I made a rather dirty fix on this.: > > simply replace (line 163 or so): [CODE] > if card_search_term in lojbancards: > print "\nThat card is already in your flashcard deck." > return > > [/CODE]with:[CODE] > > card_search_term = """%s > > > > %s > > > """ % (front, back) > > if card_search_term in lojbancards: > print "\nThat card is already in your flashcard deck." > return > > [/CODE] > > As you can see, this simply doesn't search for the first line of the > xml-entry, which contains the timestamp. Quick and dirty, but it works. :-) > > Best regards, > namor >

> > Use this thread to discuss the page:: Lojval