Talk:BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005

Archived Tiki forum discussion for BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005. Original authors, UTC times, and post IDs are retained below.

BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005 (Tiki thread #6129)

BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005

Anonymous · 2007-06-05 19:07 UTC · Tiki post #6189 (reply to #6129)

This comment is s bit misleading, as it suggests that there is something

special about MAI that breaks LALR(1). But even if MAI were to be removed from the language, or made prefix, the problem with numbers would remain just the same, because you can't tell "number MOI", "number ROI" and "number /BOI/" appart from each other without indefinite lookahead, the same goes for "lerfu-string MOI" vs. "lerfu-string /BOI/", and I think compound tags break LALR(1) too.

 "A term is either a sumti or a sumti preceded by a tense or modal tag."

Also: "na ku", "tag ku" and the most weird "fa ku" are terms.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005

PierreAbbat · 2007-06-05 22:59 UTC · Tiki post #6196 (reply to #6129)

On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:04, Jorge Llambías wrote:

> Also: "na ku", "tag ku" and the most weird "fa ku" are terms.

A term can come after {pe}, yielding some weird sentences: {le gerku pe fa ku pu viska le mlatu pe na ku}. Should we attempt to assign a meaning to those, or should we explicitly define them as meaningless?

Pierre

BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005

JohnCowan · 2007-06-06 06:07 UTC · Tiki post #6198 (reply to #6129)

Pierre Abbat scripsit:

> On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:04, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > Also: "na ku", "tag ku" and the most weird "fa ku" are terms. > > A term can come after {pe}, yielding some weird sentences: {le gerku pe fa ku > pu viska le mlatu pe na ku}. Should we attempt to assign a meaning to those, > or should we explicitly define them as meaningless?

I interpret "pe fa ku" to mean "pe the x1 of this bridi", but I can't interpret "pe naku", I admit.

-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <[email protected]>

       You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
       You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.

Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005

Anonymous · 2007-06-06 12:36 UTC · Tiki post #6199 (reply to #6129)

On 6/6/07, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Pierre Abbat scripsit: > > > > A term can come after {pe}, yielding some weird sentences: {le gerku pe fa ku > > pu viska le mlatu pe na ku}. Should we attempt to assign a meaning to those, > > or should we explicitly define them as meaningless? > > I interpret "pe fa ku" to mean "pe the x1 of this bridi", but I can't > interpret "pe naku", I admit.

How about this:

 le re mlatu cu fa'u gi xekri gi nai xekri
 .i le gerku pu viska le mlatu pe na ku

mu'o mi'e xorxes