Talk:BPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives
Archived Tiki forum discussion for BPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives. Original authors, UTC times, and post IDs are retained below.
BPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives (Tiki thread #3089)
BPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives
Anonymous · 2004-11-29 04:06 UTC · Tiki post #3090 (reply to #3089)
la treid. ku'a la traian. midju la carlyt.
phma -- li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ciBPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives
rlpowell · 2004-11-29 08:24 UTC · Tiki post #3091 (reply to #3089)
> An example of {ku'a}: > la treid. ku'a la traian. midju la carlyt.
Huh?
-RobinBPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives
xorxes · 2004-11-29 17:49 UTC · Tiki post #3092 (reply to #3089)
> An example of {ku'a}: > la treid. ku'a la traian. midju la carlyt.
i la carlyt cu tcadu i je xu la treid e la traian cu klaji
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.comBPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives
pycyn · 2004-11-29 17:49 UTC · Tiki post #3093 (reply to #3089)
streets ain't sets (well, I suppose you could ....).
--- Jorge Llambías <[email protected]> wrote:
> > --- Pierre Abbat wrote: > > > An example of {ku'a}: > > la treid. ku'a la traian. midju la carlyt. > > i la carlyt cu tcadu i je xu la treid e la > traian cu klaji > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > All your favorites on one personal page Try > My Yahoo! > http://my.yahoo.com > >
>BPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives
rlpowell · 2004-11-30 10:10 UTC · Tiki post #3094 (reply to #3089)
-Robin
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 06:44:06AM -0800, John E Clifford wrote: > If so, this is the wrong kind of itersection; > streets ain't sets (well, I suppose you could > ...). > > --- Jorge Llamb?as <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > --- Pierre Abbat wrote: > > > > > An example of {ku'a}: > > > la treid. ku'a la traian. midju la carlyt. > > > > i la carlyt cu tcadu i je xu la treid e la > > traian cu klaji > >
> > mu'o mi'e xorxesBPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives
Anonymous · 2004-11-30 10:10 UTC · Tiki post #3095 (reply to #3089)
> If so, this is the wrong kind of itersection; > streets ain't sets (well, I suppose you could > ...).
The intersection of streets is much more common in daily parlance than the intersection of sets, so I think it should have a short word. A street can be regarded as the set of points along it, so the intersection of two streets is the set of points they have in common, which is what's normally meant, barring the complication of trying to figure out whether a point in the fillet is in the street. (I doubt that Trade and Tryon are filleted; filleting rights-of-way wasn't done on old maps.)
OT: I was in Raleigh with my mother in a clothing store. I asked some saleslady, "Pardon me for being from Charlotte, but where's the Tryon room?"
phma -- li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ciBPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives
rlpowell · 2004-11-30 10:10 UTC · Tiki post #3096 (reply to #3089)
> On Monday 29 November 2004 09:44, John E Clifford wrote: > > If so, this is the wrong kind of itersection; streets ain't sets > > (well, I suppose you could ...). > > The intersection of streets is much more common in daily parlance > than the intersection of sets, so I think it should have a short > word.
It does, "kruca".
-RobinBPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives
pycyn · 2004-11-30 21:30 UTC · Tiki post #3097 (reply to #3089)
and that seems to be about the right length. On the other hand, it does seem strange to use cmavo space for all this set notation (Cartesian products are even rarer). I suppose the idea is that mathematics -- when someone gets around to doing it in Lojban -- will expect words to match the notation. I am not sure why, since all anatural languages seem to manage with it (this goes for all of MEX as well).
--- Robin Lee Powell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:35:19PM -0500, > Pierre Abbat wrote: > > On Monday 29 November 2004 09:44, John E > Clifford wrote: > > > If so, this is the wrong kind of > itersection; streets ain't sets > > > (well, I suppose you could ...). > > > > The intersection of streets is much more > common in daily parlance > > than the intersection of sets, so I think it > should have a short > > word. > > It does, "kruca". > > -Robin > >
>
