why the XS is better than the 2004 status quo: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
m (Conversion script moved page Why the XS is better than the 2004 status quo to why the XS is better than the 2004 status quo: Converting page titles to lowercase)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


Sutfak is a Perl5/Tk dictionary program, written by [[jbocre: userpagec|carbon]]. It finds gloss words and Lojban words, looks up rafsi, decomposes lujvo, keeps a running log of lookups, and finds definitions which match a given P5 regex. Homepage is at [http://sutfak.berlios.de].
The XS proposal before the BF offers the following:
 
'''lo is defined as the generic article'''
 
# We need intensionality and don't have a style that's agreed upon, and this lo can cover those cases
 
# In most usage it has been used as the generic
 
# We don't need an extensional alias for da poi; we can use su'o for that
 
# It will actually retain most or all of the properties which the Book assigns it

Latest revision as of 08:37, 30 June 2014

The XS proposal before the BF offers the following:

lo is defined as the generic article

  1. We need intensionality and don't have a style that's agreed upon, and this lo can cover those cases
  1. In most usage it has been used as the generic
  1. We don't need an extensional alias for da poi; we can use su'o for that
  1. It will actually retain most or all of the properties which the Book assigns it
Retrieved from "https://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=why_the_XS_is_better_than_the_2004_status_quo&oldid=100518"