the Difference Between Logical and Non-Logical Connectives: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m (Text replace - "{CODE}" to "</code>") |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
[[jbocre: 20:11]] <vensa> coi selpa'i | [[jbocre: 20:11]] <vensa> coi selpa'i | ||
[[jbocre: 20:11]] <rlpowell> It gets worse when it's a {le nu} or something. | [[jbocre: 20:11]] <rlpowell> It gets worse when it's a {le nu} or something.</code> | ||
Revision as of 14:19, 21 March 2014
{CODE(wrap="1]]jbocre: 20:07 <vensa> Question: how come there are a seperate set of logical connectives for sumti and tanru (eks and jeks), yet the same *non-logical* connective can be used with sumti and tanru?
jbocre: 20:08 <rlpowell> yacc deficiencies.
jbocre: 20:08 <rlpowell> When you use the non-logical connectives with sumti in the official parser or jbofihe, you have to terminate the sumti.
jbocre: 20:09 <rlpowell> An obviously unacceptable thing for something like {.e}
jbocre: 20:09 <vensa> .y
jbocre: 20:09 <vensa> I dont get it?
jbocre: 20:09 <rlpowell> Which part?
jbocre: 20:09 <vensa> why is it *obviously* unacceptable?
jbocre: 20:10 <rlpowell> To have to say {le klama ku .e ...} ?
jbocre: 20:10 <vensa> becuz it's used more often?
jbocre: 20:11 <selpa`i> Hi
jbocre: 20:11 <rlpowell> it's used all over the place, yes.
jbocre: 20:11 <rlpowell> It's a bad place to waste syllables.
jbocre: 20:11 <vensa> I understand
jbocre: 20:11 <vensa> coi selpa'i
jbocre: 20:11 <rlpowell> It gets worse when it's a {le nu} or something.