tense/modal is not equivalent to cu gotcha: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You expect to be able to use '''pu''' in place of '''cu''' in front of a selbri to close the front sumti - right? Wrong - if it's an abstraction! | |||
{{mu|le nu mi klama pu vajni}} | |||
is a sumti with parse: | |||
{{mu|<nowiki>({le < [nu (mi {klama < [pu KU] VAU>}) KEI] vajni> KU} VAU)}}</nowiki>}} | |||
==Discussion== | |||
*I don't. Sounds like someone mislearned that tenses mark the start of selbri. | |||
*To be fair, the book says: | |||
{{quotation|The placement of a tense construct within a Lojban bridi is easy: right before the selbri. It goes immediately after the '''cu''', and can in fact always replace the '''cu'''.|[[CLL]], (10.1, p. 216)}} | |||
*Of course, it then goes on to say "(although in very complex sentences the rules for eliding terminators may be changed as a result)." | |||
. | |||
cu | |||
Latest revision as of 18:43, 26 July 2015
You expect to be able to use pu in place of cu in front of a selbri to close the front sumti - right? Wrong - if it's an abstraction!
le nu mi klama pu vajni |
is a sumti with parse:
({le < [nu (mi {klama < [pu KU] VAU>}) KEI] vajni> KU} VAU)}} |
Discussion
- I don't. Sounds like someone mislearned that tenses mark the start of selbri.
- To be fair, the book says:
The placement of a tense construct within a Lojban bridi is easy: right before the selbri. It goes immediately after the cu, and can in fact always replace the cu.
— CLL, (10.1, p. 216)
- Of course, it then goes on to say "(although in very complex sentences the rules for eliding terminators may be changed as a result)."