selskiski: Difference between revisions
Spheniscine (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Spheniscine (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Many languages other than English uses this style of compound-words, e.g. French, Spanish, and Malay. | Many languages other than English uses this style of compound-words, e.g. French, Spanish, and Malay. | ||
Note that selskiski does not change lujvo. This is because lujvo are already defined words, and as such rearranging all the rafsi would be impractical. Furthermore, some decisions for rafsi assignment | Note that selskiski does not change lujvo. This is because lujvo are already defined words, and as such rearranging all the rafsi would be impractical. Furthermore, some decisions for rafsi assignment were based on the regular "skiselski" ordering, e.g. the numbers have CVC rafsi, but no CVV, which makes it impossible to reverse lujvo like '''pavdei'''. | ||
== In small doses == | == In small doses == | ||
== The real thing == | == The real thing == | ||
Revision as of 05:50, 19 July 2015
selskiski describes a style of tanru that is the inverse of the usual order of tanru. In other words, the tertau ("noun/verb", metaphorically se skicu thing described) comes before the seltau ("adjective/adverb", metaphorically skicu explainer)
Why?
This style has a chief advantage over the normal, English-like ordering of "adjective-noun"; namely, the selbri-unit that describes the subject is uttered first. There is a reason the military uses it (c.f. "Meal, Ready to Eat").
Many languages other than English uses this style of compound-words, e.g. French, Spanish, and Malay.
Note that selskiski does not change lujvo. This is because lujvo are already defined words, and as such rearranging all the rafsi would be impractical. Furthermore, some decisions for rafsi assignment were based on the regular "skiselski" ordering, e.g. the numbers have CVC rafsi, but no CVV, which makes it impossible to reverse lujvo like pavdei.