ci'a: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (Text replace - "jbocre: ([a-z])" to "$1") |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''ci'a''' was once the official modal for ''ciska'', but it was considered [[malglico|malglico]], since the concept actually required was one of authorship rather than scribehood. It was replaced by [[fi'e|fi'e]], derived from [[finti|finti]]. Since then it has remained an [[unassigned cmavo|unassigned cmavo]]. | |||
See: | |||
* [http://wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9104/msg00082.html] for a representative rant against ''ci'a'' by [[User:Nick Nicholas|Nick Nicholas]], | |||
* [http://wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9106/msg00007.html] for a response by [[User:Bob LeChevalier|Bob LeChevalier]], | |||
* [http://wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9106/msg00043.html] for the grammar change that made ''fi'e'' available, | |||
* [http://wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9106/msg00045.html] for the proposal to differentiate ''ci'a'' and ''fi'e'' modal, | |||
* [http://wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9201/msg00074.html] as proof of the early effacement of the cmavo. | |||
* [http:// | |||
Latest revision as of 14:53, 23 March 2014
ci'a was once the official modal for ciska, but it was considered malglico, since the concept actually required was one of authorship rather than scribehood. It was replaced by fi'e, derived from finti. Since then it has remained an unassigned cmavo.
See:
- [1] for a representative rant against ci'a by Nick Nicholas,
- [2] for a response by Bob LeChevalier,
- [3] for the grammar change that made fi'e available,
- [4] for the proposal to differentiate ci'a and fi'e modal,
- [5] as proof of the early effacement of the cmavo.