why the XS is better than the 2004 status quo
Revision as of 14:43, 23 March 2014 by Gleki (talk | contribs) (Gleki moved page jbocre: Why the XS is better than the 2004 status quo to Why the XS is better than the 2004 status quo without leaving a redirect: Text replace - "jbocre: ([A-Z])" to "$1")
The XS proposal before the BF offers the following:
lo is defined as the generic article
- We need intensionality and don't have a style that's agreed upon, and this lo can cover those cases
- In most usage it has been used as the generic
- We don't need an extensional alias for da poi; we can use su'o for that
- It will actually retain most or all of the properties which the Book assigns it