why the XS is better than the 2004 status quo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (Conversion script moved page Why the XS is better than the 2004 status quo to why the XS is better than the 2004 status quo: Converting page titles to lowercase) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:37, 30 June 2014
The XS proposal before the BF offers the following:
lo is defined as the generic article
- We need intensionality and don't have a style that's agreed upon, and this lo can cover those cases
- In most usage it has been used as the generic
- We don't need an extensional alias for da poi; we can use su'o for that
- It will actually retain most or all of the properties which the Book assigns it