bu: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:


Probably inadvisable for political reasons...but it would be nice to have such succinct terms as ''zoity. nur ty.'' ("dignity") and ''zoity. ruv ty.'' ("justice").
bu is the only word in selma'o BU. bu binds with the (pseudo-)word to the left to create a letteral. bu is one of the [[jbocre: Magic Words|Magic Words]].


Why from Klingon? You can just as easily borrow from English; Klingon doesn't have that many terms that don't translate well to English.  (Why borrow for that matter?  Lojban may need weightier terms, but that's why we have ''cei'': define them once in terms of a lujvo or tanru, and assign them to something short.  Better to define your terms in Lojban than to borrow and hope your interlocutor speaks the source language.  Sort of defeats the purpose of Lojban, otherwise).  ''--mi'e mark.'' believe it or not.
=== Interaction with other Magic Words ===


Probably inadvisable for reasons of ''sanity''; and the same would hold whether the loan was from Klingon, English, or Uzbek. dignity: selsi'atra or zanpanpytra; justice: pairvu'e. Why on ''earth'' would you want to borrow such simple terms as fu'ivla at all? Besides, what is it about the Klingon concept of justice that makes such a loan preferable to, I dunno, zoigy. justice gy.? -- mi'e [[User:Nick Nicholas|nitcion]], shaking his head in amazement (particularly about the claim that a Type 1 fu'ivla can be regarded as succinct in any model of Lojban...)
For every magic word, the interaction with all other magic words is defined. This table covers all interactions of bu+word, where word is any of the magic words, both alone and within their own grammatical contexts.


* It might be worth borrowing a term for the concept of "Gowachin law" from Frank Herbert's novels, but unfortunately we haven't ''got'' the original Gowachin term.  Whatever it was, "law" turned out to be a poor translation. --[[jbocre: John Cowan c|John Cowan c]]
|| bu  | bu                | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to.         | bu bu              | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | the first bu is ungrammatical, as it has no word on the left to bind to.  The rest of the statement is ignored. |


** OK, I'll bite"Gowachin law" ki'a??? ''--mi'e mark
| bu .ybu            | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | the first bu is ungrammatical, as it has no word on the left to bind toThe rest of the statement is ignored.          | bu .abu            | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | the first bu is ungrammatical, as it has no word on the left to bind to.  The rest of the statement is ignored. |


*** Herbert's ''Dosadi Experiment'' is out of print (though readily available used), but [http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dunes/1352/dosadiexperiment.html his set of quotations] basically tells the story. The following quotation gives the flavor:
fa'o | bu fa'o            | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to.    lo'u | bu lo'u            | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. |


;:No legal system can maintain justice unless every participant--magisters, prosecutors, Legums, defendants, witnesses, all--risks life itself in whatever dispute comes before the bar. Everything must be risked in the Courtarenas. If any element remains outside the contest and without personal risk, justice inevitably fails.
| bu lo'u le'u      | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to.     le'u | bu le'u            | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. |


--For their sheer ''outrageousness''?
sa  | bu sa              | [[jbocre: nil|nil]]          | sa backtracks to the beginning of the text, erasing bu.          | bu sa bu          | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | sa backtracks to the beginning of the text, erasing the first bu. The second bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. |


.i za'a su'o da djica lenu pilno la lojban kei mu'i leka cizra ra'u .i lenu fukpi loi valsi loi bangrtlingana valsi cu ji'a nu cizra .i mi ku'i na go'e djica -- mi'e [[User:Nick Nicholas|nitcion]]
| bu sa .abu        | BY              | sa backtracks to the beginning of the text, erasing the first bu. The second bu binds with .a to create a BY pseudo-word. |


----
| bu sa broda        | broda            | sa backtracks to the beginning of the text, erasing bu.  broda is then parsed. |


(One is reminded a little bit of the [http://www.clockworkorange.com/nadsat.asp ussified teenspeak] in "Clockwork Orange"...)
si  | bu si              | [[jbocre: nil|nil]]          | si binds with bu and backtracks to the beginning of the text.          | bu si si          | [[jbocre: nil|nil]]          | the first si binds with bu and backtracks to the beginning of the text. the second si backtracks to the beginning of the text. |
 
su  | bu su              | [[jbocre: nil|nil]]          | su backtracks to the beginning of the text.          | bu su su          | [[jbocre: nil|nil]]          | the first su backtracks to the beginning of the text. the second su backtracks to the beginning of the text. |
 
zei  | bu zei            | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | zei binds with bu on the left, but there is nothing to bind on the right, which is ungrammatical. | *controversial
 
| bu zei bu          | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | zei is not permitted to bind with bu on the left, so this statement is ungrammatical. | *controversial
 
| bu zei .abu        | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | zei is not permitted to bind with bu on the left, so this statement is ungrammatical. | *controversial
 
| .abu zei bu        | zei-BRIVLA      | the first bu binds with .a to create a BY word.  zei binds with this BY on the left, then with bu on the right, creating a zei-BRIVLA. | *controversial
 
| .abu zei .abu      | BY              | the first bu binds with .a to create a BY word.  zei binds with this BY on the left, then with bu on the right.  The second bu then binds with this zei-BRIVLA to create a BY pseudo-word. | *controversial
 
zo  | bu zo              | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to.          | bu zo broda        | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. |
 
zoi  | bu zoi            | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to.          | bu zoi .gy.        | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. |
 
| bu zoi .gy. .gy.  | [[jbocre: ungrammatical|ungrammatical]] | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. ||
 
Note that since bu is left-associative, most of the tests on this page are ungrammatical.  For valid uses of bu, please see the bu examples on the other Magic Words pages.
 
bu, like le'u, is interesting in that it is a valid Lojban word, but is by itself not grammatical.  This makes the bu's interaction with sa, si, and su different than it's behavior with other Magic Words, a trait it shares in common with le'u. 
 
===  Questions about interaction with other Magic Words ===
 
'''Q''': If {bu bu} is not grammatical, what do I use for a bu letteral?
 
'''A''': If you're trying to express the concept of a "meta-letter," you might try {sei bu}, {skubancu bu} or {nunbancu bu}.  You can also quote bo with zo and bind that construct to bu: {zo bu bu}.  You could argue that the meaning of the first bu is lost before the second bu binds.
 
'''Q''': How do bu and sa interact?
 
'''A''': {sa bu} backtracks past the bu, but not the word bu is binding to.  This might be the only instance of one Magic Word decomposing a pseudo-word back into it's component words.  {sa by} backtracks past the BY pseudo-word created by BU.
 
'''Q''': In {sa bu} since sa backtracks to the beginning of the string, and bu is not grammatical without a word to bind on the left, what do I use for the sa letteral?
 
'''A''': If you're trying to express the concept of erasure, you might try {vimcu bu}.  You can also quote sa with zo and bind that construct to bu: {zo sa bu}.  You could argue that the meaning of sa is lost before bu binds.
 
'''Q''': What about the {si} and {su} letteral?
 
'''A''':
 
'''Q''': seriously zei?
 
'''A''': I'm fixing it.
 
===  See Also ===
 
* [http://dag.github.com/cll/17/3/ LL 17.3 Upper and lower cases]
* [http://dag.github.com/cll/17/4/ LL 17.4 The universal "bu"]

Revision as of 16:45, 4 November 2013

bu is the only word in selma'o BU. bu binds with the (pseudo-)word to the left to create a letteral. bu is one of the Magic Words.

Interaction with other Magic Words

For every magic word, the interaction with all other magic words is defined. This table covers all interactions of bu+word, where word is any of the magic words, both alone and within their own grammatical contexts.

|| bu | bu | ungrammatical | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. | bu bu | ungrammatical | the first bu is ungrammatical, as it has no word on the left to bind to. The rest of the statement is ignored. |

| bu .ybu | ungrammatical | the first bu is ungrammatical, as it has no word on the left to bind to. The rest of the statement is ignored. | bu .abu | ungrammatical | the first bu is ungrammatical, as it has no word on the left to bind to. The rest of the statement is ignored. |

fa'o | bu fa'o | ungrammatical | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. lo'u | bu lo'u | ungrammatical | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. |

| bu lo'u le'u | ungrammatical | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. le'u | bu le'u | ungrammatical | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. |

sa | bu sa | nil | sa backtracks to the beginning of the text, erasing bu. | bu sa bu | ungrammatical | sa backtracks to the beginning of the text, erasing the first bu. The second bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. |

| bu sa .abu | BY | sa backtracks to the beginning of the text, erasing the first bu. The second bu binds with .a to create a BY pseudo-word. |

| bu sa broda | broda | sa backtracks to the beginning of the text, erasing bu. broda is then parsed. |

si | bu si | nil | si binds with bu and backtracks to the beginning of the text. | bu si si | nil | the first si binds with bu and backtracks to the beginning of the text. the second si backtracks to the beginning of the text. |

su | bu su | nil | su backtracks to the beginning of the text. | bu su su | nil | the first su backtracks to the beginning of the text. the second su backtracks to the beginning of the text. |

zei | bu zei | ungrammatical | zei binds with bu on the left, but there is nothing to bind on the right, which is ungrammatical. | *controversial

| bu zei bu | ungrammatical | zei is not permitted to bind with bu on the left, so this statement is ungrammatical. | *controversial

| bu zei .abu | ungrammatical | zei is not permitted to bind with bu on the left, so this statement is ungrammatical. | *controversial

| .abu zei bu | zei-BRIVLA | the first bu binds with .a to create a BY word. zei binds with this BY on the left, then with bu on the right, creating a zei-BRIVLA. | *controversial

| .abu zei .abu | BY | the first bu binds with .a to create a BY word. zei binds with this BY on the left, then with bu on the right. The second bu then binds with this zei-BRIVLA to create a BY pseudo-word. | *controversial

zo | bu zo | ungrammatical | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. | bu zo broda | ungrammatical | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. |

zoi | bu zoi | ungrammatical | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. | bu zoi .gy. | ungrammatical | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. |

| bu zoi .gy. .gy. | ungrammatical | bu is ungrammatical with no word on the left to bind to. ||

Note that since bu is left-associative, most of the tests on this page are ungrammatical. For valid uses of bu, please see the bu examples on the other Magic Words pages.

bu, like le'u, is interesting in that it is a valid Lojban word, but is by itself not grammatical. This makes the bu's interaction with sa, si, and su different than it's behavior with other Magic Words, a trait it shares in common with le'u.

Questions about interaction with other Magic Words

Q: If {bu bu} is not grammatical, what do I use for a bu letteral?

A: If you're trying to express the concept of a "meta-letter," you might try {sei bu}, {skubancu bu} or {nunbancu bu}. You can also quote bo with zo and bind that construct to bu: {zo bu bu}. You could argue that the meaning of the first bu is lost before the second bu binds.

Q: How do bu and sa interact?

A: {sa bu} backtracks past the bu, but not the word bu is binding to. This might be the only instance of one Magic Word decomposing a pseudo-word back into it's component words. {sa by} backtracks past the BY pseudo-word created by BU.

Q: In {sa bu} since sa backtracks to the beginning of the string, and bu is not grammatical without a word to bind on the left, what do I use for the sa letteral?

A: If you're trying to express the concept of erasure, you might try {vimcu bu}. You can also quote sa with zo and bind that construct to bu: {zo sa bu}. You could argue that the meaning of sa is lost before bu binds.

Q: What about the {si} and {su} letteral?

A:

Q: seriously zei?

A: I'm fixing it.

See Also