Talk:samtrosku specification: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Spheniscine (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==While-loops and Do-while loops== I invented {{jvs|ganfauke}} and {{jvs|faubganke}} for this purpose, though I might concede that they might be more opaque even if more techn...") |
Spheniscine (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==While-loops and Do-while loops== | ==While-loops and Do-while loops== | ||
I invented {{jvs|ganfauke}} and {{jvs|faubganke}} for this purpose, though I might concede that they might be more opaque even if more technically accurate. However, one problem is that do-while loops are supposed to happen at least once. | I invented {{jvs|ganfauke}} and {{jvs|faubganke}} for this purpose, though I might concede that they might be more opaque even if more technically accurate. However, one problem with the '''ca le du'u''' solution is that do-while loops are supposed to happen at least once. | ||
Another problem is that there is currently no grammatical way to attach a '''ca le du'u''' after a '''tu'e...tu'u''' block, without an experimental solution like {{jvs|zo'au}} ("postnex" definition; '''se zo'u''' has also been suggested). My brivla does introduce a different problem on that front though, as it would often require several statements within a single NU. '''lo nu tu'e ... tu'u''' has been suggested but is not yet implemented in parsers. | |||
[[User:Spheniscine|Spheniscine]] ([[User talk:Spheniscine|talk]]) 17:36, 25 November 2015 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:36, 26 November 2015
While-loops and Do-while loops
I invented ganfauke and faubganke for this purpose, though I might concede that they might be more opaque even if more technically accurate. However, one problem with the ca le du'u solution is that do-while loops are supposed to happen at least once.
Another problem is that there is currently no grammatical way to attach a ca le du'u after a tu'e...tu'u block, without an experimental solution like zo'au ("postnex" definition; se zo'u has also been suggested). My brivla does introduce a different problem on that front though, as it would often require several statements within a single NU. lo nu tu'e ... tu'u has been suggested but is not yet implemented in parsers.
Spheniscine (talk) 17:36, 25 November 2015 (PST)