View source for Talk:BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005

Posted by Anonymous on Tue 05 of June, 2007 19:07 GMT
This comment is s bit misleading, as it suggests that there is something 
special about MAI that breaks LALR(1). But even if MAI were to be removed 
from the language, or made prefix, the problem with numbers would remain 
just the same, because you can't tell "number MOI", "number ROI" and 
"number /BOI/" appart from each other without indefinite lookahead, 
the same goes for "lerfu-string MOI" vs. "lerfu-string /BOI/", and I think 
compound tags break LALR(1) too.

  
"A term is either a sumti or a sumti preceded by a tense or modal tag."

Also: "na ku", "tag ku" and the most weird "fa ku" are terms.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

  
Score: 0.00 Vote:   1   2   3   4   5    top of page Reply
 Edit  Delete  Report this post	

BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005

Posted by PierreAbbat on Tue 05 of June, 2007 22:59 GMT posts: 324
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:04, Jorge Llambías wrote: 
> Also: "na ku", "tag ku" and the most weird "fa ku" are terms.

A term can come after {pe}, yielding some weird sentences: {le gerku pe fa ku 
pu viska le mlatu pe na ku}. Should we attempt to assign a meaning to those, 
or should we explicitly define them as meaningless?

Pierre

  
Score: 0.00 Vote:   1   2   3   4   5    top of page Reply
 Edit  Delete  Report this post	

BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005

Posted by JohnCowan on Wed 06 of June, 2007 06:07 GMT posts: 149
Pierre Abbat scripsit: 
> On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:04, Jorge Llambías wrote: 
> > Also: "na ku", "tag ku" and the most weird "fa ku" are terms. 
> 
> A term can come after {pe}, yielding some weird sentences: {le gerku pe fa ku 
> pu viska le mlatu pe na ku}. Should we attempt to assign a meaning to those, 
> or should we explicitly define them as meaningless?

I interpret "pe fa ku" to mean "pe the x1 of this bridi", but I can't 
interpret "pe naku", I admit.

-- 
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan 
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. 
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. 
Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

  
Score: 0.00 Vote:   1   2   3   4   5    top of page Reply
 Edit  Delete  Report this post	

BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo as of 11 Feb 2005

Posted by Anonymous on Wed 06 of June, 2007 12:36 GMT
On 6/6/07, John Cowan wrote: 
> Pierre Abbat scripsit: 
> > 
> > A term can come after {pe}, yielding some weird sentences: {le gerku pe fa ku 
> > pu viska le mlatu pe na ku}. Should we attempt to assign a meaning to those, 
> > or should we explicitly define them as meaningless? 
> 
> I interpret "pe fa ku" to mean "pe the x1 of this bridi", but I can't 
> interpret "pe naku", I admit.

How about this:

le re mlatu cu fa'u gi xekri gi nai xekri 
.i le gerku pu viska le mlatu pe na ku

mu'o mi'e xorxes