Jump to: navigation, search

Linguistic relativism

50 bytes added, 1 year ago
no edit summary
'''Linguistic relativism''' refers to speculations about the varied influence of different languages upon thought. So-called "strong" forms of linguistic relativism are known as [[linguistic determinism]]: The [[Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis]] is the best known example, in so far as it proposes that perception and cognition is determined or constrained by characteristics that vary between languages. A "weak" interpretation supposes that linguistic differences may influence "performance", but do not limit "competence".
Linguistic relativism is often contrasted with theories of [[universal grammar]] (UG), notably as elaborated by [[Noam Chomsky]]. UG emphasizes the role of evolution in developing a universal "mental grammar" as a capacity of the human species, which is said to serve as a foundation for all natural languages. The concept of universal grammar does not preclude the notion that language has a role in the formation of thought, but proponents such as [[Steven Pinker]] argue that the common biological basis for the human capacity of language with its "deep structure" is a much stronger determiner determinant than differences in the "surface structure" between languages.
Bureaucrats, forumadmin, staff, Administrators, translate-proofr, uploader, Widget editors

Navigation menu