xe'i: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://balance.wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9501/msg00017.html Proposed by] [[Goran Topic|Goran Topic]]:


A proposed [[jbocre: fu'ivla|fu'ivla]] from Ancient [[jbocre: Loglan|Loglan]] days, when fu'ivla could
It's a way of expressing ''ago'', as in giving the specific amount of time it has been since something happened. (It would work equally well for the future.) This is useful, and it has been noted before that Lojban does not have an explicit way of doing this, but I think that what we have now - phrases like '''pu pa jeftu''' - work well enough. Literally, ''before something which is a week long'', where the thing is assumed from context to be the time interval between when it happened and now.


look like [[jbocre: gismu|gismu]].  The proposed meaning was ''x1 is a bad programmer'',
Similarly, ''30 kilometers north of here'' would be '''be'a pa ki'otre be li cino''', where the thing which is 30 kilometers long is assumed to be the distance from here to there.
 
*Unfortunately, it's not entirely clear; '''pu pa jeftu''' could refer to ''before a week-long vacation'', and '''be'a pa ki'otre be li cino''' could mean just on the north side of a road which is 30 km long. Perhaps this could be avoided by using '''pu le jeftu''' and '''be'a le ki'otre be li cino''' instead.
believe it or not.
*[[rab.spir|rab.spir]]:
 
*:The alternative is termsets, which are evil and wordy, and for which the Book gives too few examples.
''You mean they can't anymore? What about [[jbocre: mekso|mekso]]?''
**[[User:xorxes|xorxes]]:
 
**:A better alternative is to use the space and time distance tags (VA and ZI) to tag space and time distances. So '''za lo jeftu''' for ''a week ago'' or ''a week hence'' (the tense determines which) and '''va lo ki'otre be li cino''' for ''30 km away'' (in a direction determined eventually by a FAhA).
* The point is that you cannot, under the baseline, add any 5-letter brivla to the language.  In Pre-[[jbocre: GMR|GMR]] Loglan, brivla had the form of gismu or CVC+gismu or CVC+CVC+gismu etc. Any brivla could take any form; lujvo were made by gluing random bits of gismu together, and you couldn't reliably disassemble them.  See [[jbocre: Jenny|Jenny]].
***I suppose that it would be clear from context whether you are using the tags like that. However, as the list message points out, '''vi le broda''' is often used to mean ''near the broda'' - though '''zi''' isn't usually used that way (on the other hand, '''ca''' is used for time, but rarely '''bu'u''' for space). This is partially the cmavo list's fault, giving '''vi ma''' and '''ca ma''' for ''where?'' and ''when?''. So the same problem results - '''va lo ki'otre be li cino''' could mean ''in the general area of the road that is 30 km long''.
 
* (This possibly belongs on another page)... I personally don't see any problem with considering as a fu'ivla ''any'' word that isn't a '''known''' [[jbocre: gismu|gismu]], a [[jbocre: lujvo|lujvo]], a [[jbocre: cmene|cmene]], or a [[jbocre: compound|compound]] [[jbocre: cmavo|cmavo]] (and of course, that neither sheds (''[[jbocre: tosmabru|tosmabru]]'') nor absorbs (''[[jbocre: slinku'i|slinku'i]]'') cmavo).  OK, whatever other limitations too (I know fu'ivla can't have a '''''y''''', though I'm not sure why). '''''Basically because it makes the slinku'i test harder, IIRC. --[[jbocre: John Cowan|John Cowan]]''''' The point is, anything that isn't anything else can be a fu'ivla, or more generally, a nonce-[[jbocre: brivla|brivla]]. That's really the point: nonce-words should be usable pretty much anywhere. That's why god created ''za'e'' and ''cei''.  Just so long as you say somewhere near the top of your document/discussion ''loi spero (cei seke bangu je kulnu ke'e bela'o .pan. Esperanto .pan.)...'' or whatever.  Even [[jbocre: rafsi|rafsi]] are okay!  You can probably expect people to be able to deduce from the fact that you're using ''spero'' that the rafsi ''sper-'' belongs to it, but if that's a problem, well, you can say ''(zo sper. rafsi zo spero)''. So basically, to me, anything not something else can be a nonce-brivla.  Why not?  Mathematicians and even casual speakers often redefine the notation for the duration of a paper. --''mi'e mark.''
 
The equivalent of ''xruki'' at that time was ''turki''.
 
*''Where in the world does this come from?''
** ''Where does what come from?''
 
*** ''The source of the word "terki".''
****I assumed it was from ''turkey''; I'd be disappointed if it wasn't. [[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]]
 
*****I think we'd all be astonished if it wasn't.  I have gotten my [[jbocre: The L|Loglanist]]s out of cold storage, so soon we will know all about ''terki'' and [[jbocre: Jeeg|Jeeg]] and [[jbocre: Talen|Talen]]. --[[jbocre: John Cowan|John Cowan]]
****** Well, we have J&T now. Does terki show up in your old Loglanists?
 
******* Yes, it does; and no, the etymology isn't explained -- probably considered too obvious.

Latest revision as of 17:02, 30 June 2018

Proposed by Goran Topic:

It's a way of expressing ago, as in giving the specific amount of time it has been since something happened. (It would work equally well for the future.) This is useful, and it has been noted before that Lojban does not have an explicit way of doing this, but I think that what we have now - phrases like pu pa jeftu - work well enough. Literally, before something which is a week long, where the thing is assumed from context to be the time interval between when it happened and now.

Similarly, 30 kilometers north of here would be be'a pa ki'otre be li cino, where the thing which is 30 kilometers long is assumed to be the distance from here to there.

  • Unfortunately, it's not entirely clear; pu pa jeftu could refer to before a week-long vacation, and be'a pa ki'otre be li cino could mean just on the north side of a road which is 30 km long. Perhaps this could be avoided by using pu le jeftu and be'a le ki'otre be li cino instead.
  • rab.spir:
    The alternative is termsets, which are evil and wordy, and for which the Book gives too few examples.
    • xorxes:
      A better alternative is to use the space and time distance tags (VA and ZI) to tag space and time distances. So za lo jeftu for a week ago or a week hence (the tense determines which) and va lo ki'otre be li cino for 30 km away (in a direction determined eventually by a FAhA).
      • I suppose that it would be clear from context whether you are using the tags like that. However, as the list message points out, vi le broda is often used to mean near the broda - though zi isn't usually used that way (on the other hand, ca is used for time, but rarely bu'u for space). This is partially the cmavo list's fault, giving vi ma and ca ma for where? and when?. So the same problem results - va lo ki'otre be li cino could mean in the general area of the road that is 30 km long.