View source for why the XS is better than the 2004 status quo


The XS proposal before the BF offers the following:

'''lo is defined as the generic article'''

# We need intensionality and don't have a style that's agreed upon, and this lo can cover those cases

# In most usage it has been used as the generic

# We don't need an extensional alias for da poi; we can use su'o for that

# It will actually retain most or all of the properties which the Book assigns it