rants: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:


(CLL:) "The abstractor ''si'o'' expresses a mental image, a concept, an idea:
See also [[BPFK Section: Opinionated Gripes]], which focuses more on [[jbocre: tinkering|tinkering]].


9.2) mi nelci le si'o la lojban. cu mulno
* [[jbocre: GismuRant|GismuRant]]
* [[jbocre: Rant: Against Experimental Gismu]]


I enjoy the concept-of Lojban being-complete."
* [[jbocre: Rant: e'o and e'u are not commands]]
* [[jbocre: tanru versus lujvo rant|tanru versus lujvo rant]]


I have mostly considered ''si'o broda'' a shorthand for ''sidbo be le broda bei zu'i'':
* [[jbocre: tanru are not metaphors rant|tanru are not metaphors rant]]
* [[jbocre: observatives are not irregular rant|observatives are not irregular rant]]


sidbo x1 (idea abstract) is an idea/concept/thought about x2 (object/abstract) by thinker x3 (also (adjective:) x1 is ideal/ideational); (cf. ciksi, jijnu, mucti, jinvi, nabmi, pensi, xanri, cmavo list si'o)
* [[jbocre: pilno rant|pilno rant]]
 
* [[jbocre: ng rant|ng rant]]
My usage precedes the invention of ''ce'u'' & perhaps has not evolved accordingly, but see:
 
"7. In si'o abstractions, all elided sumti are interpreted as ce'u" as [[jbocre: ka, du'u, si'o, ce'u, zo'e here|ka, du'u, si'o, ce'u, zo'e here]].
 
----
 
Your use of ''si'o'' was a prime consideration in coming up with (7), what with you appearing to be one of the main users of ''si'o''. --[[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]]

Revision as of 17:09, 4 November 2013