Difference between revisions of "obsolete experimental cmavo"

From Lojban
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{{cmavo|cau'e|COI|vocative: comforting noise made toward infants (suggested by [[Jordan DeLong|Jordan DeLong]])}}
 
{{cmavo|cau'e|COI|vocative: comforting noise made toward infants (suggested by [[Jordan DeLong|Jordan DeLong]])}}
 
* [[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]] think ''ki'ai'' + some appropriate sound would be more appropriate here, in that it it is a solution that generalizes to other quasi-vocatives.
 
* [[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]] think ''ki'ai'' + some appropriate sound would be more appropriate here, in that it it is a solution that generalizes to other quasi-vocatives.
 
 
{{cmavo|ci'a|BAI|as written by: ciska modal, 1st place, as written by source}}
 
{{cmavo|ci'a|BAI|as written by: ciska modal, 1st place, as written by source}}
 
*Why isn't '''cu'u''' good enough? Isn't '''ciska''' a type of '''cusku?'''
 
*Why isn't '''cu'u''' good enough? Isn't '''ciska''' a type of '''cusku?'''
Line 15: Line 14:
 
*** I've no idea. Go read the messages where Djer proposed it.
 
*** I've no idea. Go read the messages where Djer proposed it.
 
{{cmavo|xe'e1|PA|any}}
 
{{cmavo|xe'e1|PA|any}}
 
+
{{cmavo|xi'i3|XI|degree of [[Fuzzy Logic|Fuzzy Logic]] truth}}
;'''[[xi'i3]]''' [[XI|XI]] degree of [[Fuzzy Logic|Fuzzy Logic]] truth:
+
*I think they also call this '''jei'''
 
 
''I think they also call this '''jei'''''
 
 
 
----
 
 
 
 
{{cmavo|xoi|ROI|means the same as [[JAhA + CAI|ja'axi]], discovered in [http://lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter19.html#e6d12 The book] after I ([[User:xod|(xod]]) invented [[xoi|xoi]]}}
 
{{cmavo|xoi|ROI|means the same as [[JAhA + CAI|ja'axi]], discovered in [http://lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter19.html#e6d12 The book] after I ([[User:xod|(xod]]) invented [[xoi|xoi]]}}
 
 
{{cmavo|xoi|???|abbreviation for '''lo'e du'u''' or conceivably '''tu'o su'u'''}}
 
{{cmavo|xoi|???|abbreviation for '''lo'e du'u''' or conceivably '''tu'o su'u'''}}
 
* Moved to Obsolete Experimental Cmavo because it is incompatible with the baseline. --[[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]]
 
* Moved to Obsolete Experimental Cmavo because it is incompatible with the baseline. --[[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]]
  
----
+
{{cmavo|xo'o|XOhU|means the same as [[xe'e]]nai}}
 
+
*You really want to fill up x-cmavo space don't you? What is wrong with xe'enai or na xe'e?
;'''[[xo'o|xo'o]]''' [[XOhU|XOhU]]: means the same as [[xe'e|xe'e]]nai
+
{{cmavo|xo'u|XOhU|high scope mark: marks the following word as going to the start of the prenex at the start of the sentence. '''xe'enai''', conversely, notes that the following word does <u>not</u> got to the start of the prenex.}}
 
+
*But what might actually be useful is a way to start a prenex at some place else in the sentence, resembling the English usage of listing undefined variables in a sentence and ending with a clause that says "where x=5 and r=2.3".
''You really want to fill up x-cmavo space don't you? What is wrong with xe'enai or na xe'e?''
+
{{cmavo|xu'u|LUhU|[[xa'a|xa'a1]] terminator}}
 
+
{{cmavo|zi'oi|SE|indicates that one or more argument places are annulled (proposed by [[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]])}}
----
 
 
 
;'''[[xo'u|xo'u]]''' [[XOhU|XOhU]] high scope mark: marks the following word as going to the start of the prenex at the start of the sentence. '''xe'enai''', conversely, notes that the following word does ''not'' got to the start of the prenex.
 
 
 
''But what might actually be useful is a way to start a prenex at some place else in the sentence, resembling the English usage of listing undefined variables in a sentence and ending with a clause that says "where x=5 and r=2.3".''
 
 
 
----
 
 
 
;'''[[xu'u|xu'u]]''' [[LUhU|LUhU]] [[xa'a1]] terminator:
 
 
 
----
 
 
 
;'''[[zi'oi|zi'oi]]''' [[SE|SE]]: indicates that one or more argument places are annulled.: (proposed by AndR.)
 
 
 
----
 

Revision as of 04:56, 30 June 2018

cau'e [COI] particle: vocative: comforting noise made toward infants (suggested by Jordan DeLong)
  • And Rosta think ki'ai + some appropriate sound would be more appropriate here, in that it it is a solution that generalizes to other quasi-vocatives.
ci'a [BAI] particle: as written by: ciska modal, 1st place, as written by source
  • Why isn't cu'u good enough? Isn't ciska a type of cusku?
fai'i [FA] particle: Function similar to fai. And Rosta
jai'i [SE] particle: Function similar to jai. And Rosta
ki'i'o [KI] particle: Synonym for ki
sa'ai [SA] particle: next word begins nonstandard construction.: (Hopefully this stops the sentence from being parsed.): (proposed by but not endorsed by AndR)
xa'a [XAhA] particle: abstract to concrete converter: converts abstractions into concrete sumti, inverse of tu'a
  • Doesnt le su'u do what you want?
    • And Rosta:
      • I've no idea. Go read the messages where Djer proposed it.
xe'e1 [PA] particle: any
xi'i3 [XI] particle: degree of Fuzzy Logic truth
  • I think they also call this jei
xoi [ROI] particle: means the same as ja'axi, discovered in The book after I ((xod) invented xoi
xoi [???] particle: abbreviation for lo'e du'u or conceivably tu'o su'u
  • Moved to Obsolete Experimental Cmavo because it is incompatible with the baseline. --And Rosta
xo'o [XOhU] particle: means the same as xe'enai
  • You really want to fill up x-cmavo space don't you? What is wrong with xe'enai or na xe'e?
xo'u [XOhU] particle: high scope mark: marks the following word as going to the start of the prenex at the start of the sentence. xe'enai, conversely, notes that the following word does not got to the start of the prenex.
  • But what might actually be useful is a way to start a prenex at some place else in the sentence, resembling the English usage of listing undefined variables in a sentence and ending with a clause that says "where x=5 and r=2.3".
xu'u [LUhU] particle: xa'a1 terminator
zi'oi [SE] particle: indicates that one or more argument places are annulled (proposed by And Rosta)