|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
| |
|
| == Books ==
| | [[jbocre: mi'e [jbocre: And|And]] |
|
| |
|
| * Pre-introductory is Jay's [[jbocre: Jay's Lojban Brochure|Jay's Lojban Brochure]].
| | Superseded by ''[[jbocre: poi'i|poi'i]]''. |
| * People who send a postcard to the LLG receive the [[jbocre: Level -1 flyer]].
| |
|
| |
|
| * For a more detailed introduction, please see [[User:Nick Nicholas|Nick Nicholas]] and [[jbocre: John Cowan|John Cowan]]'s ''[http://lojban.org/publications/level0.html hat is Lojban?]'', which has become the [[jbocre: Level 0 Booklet]] for [[jbocre: The Logical Language Group|The Logical Language Group]], and is available from [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0966028317/qid=1062895255/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/102-4826386-3031311?v=glance&s=books&n=507846 mazon Books]. There is an incomplete PDF of [http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-download_wiki_attachment.php?attId=89 he first 19 pages of the Level 0 Booklet], a project in progress, which typesets and illustrates the diagrams with nested tables.
| | Speculatively proposed in [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/9301], repeated here: |
| * Next there is ''[http://ptolemy.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis/lojbanbrochure/lessons/book1.html ojban For Beginners]'' (the "[[jbocre: lessons|lessons]]"), by [[jbocre: Robin Turner|Robin Turner]] and Nick Nicholas, currently being edited by Nick Nicholas.
| |
|
| |
|
| ** Robin Turner wrote [http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin/lojbancourse.html ome lessons], but they were used as the basis for the above ''Lojban For Beginners'', which is more complete. | | ---- |
| * Finally, the '''ultimate''' educational resource is the canonical text [[jbocre: The Complete Lojban Language|The Complete Lojban Language]], available in paper from the [[jbocre: The Logical Language Group|The Logical Language Group]], or in draft form [http://lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar.html n line].
| | |
| | Recent distinct threads have established |
| | |
| | (a) that {ka} is redundant, since {du'u} can serve all the |
| | |
| | functions of current {ka} |
| | |
| | (b) that there is a need to be able to define reflexive |
| | |
| | selbri that can function as sumti tails, analgously to |
| | |
| | {da noi ke'a ke'a lumci} = "something that *self-washes*". |
| | |
| | I first propose a NU, {kai'i}, meaning "ckaji (be le ka)". |
| | |
| | Then |
| | |
| | da noi ke'a ke'a lumci |
| | |
| | = lo kai'i ce'u ce'u lumci |
| | |
| | = lo ckaji be tu'o du'u ce'u ce'u lumci |
| | |
| | And more generally: |
| | |
| | lo broda |
| | |
| | = da noi ke'a broda |
| | |
| | = lo kai'i ce'u broda |
|
| |
|
| ----
| | = lo ckaji be tu'o du'u ce'u broda |
| | |
| | da noi mi djuno tu'o du'u ke'a broda |
| | |
| | = lo kai'i mi djuno tu'o du'u ce'u broda |
|
| |
|
| * A [[jbocre: phrasebook|phrasebook]] is being compiled.
| | = lo ckaji be tu'o du'u mi djuno tu'o du'u ce'u broda |
| * [[jbocre: Multimedia|Multimedia]] and other materials which aren't purely textual (sound recordings)
| |
|
| |
|
| * [[jbocre: .i tavla fi la lojban ri|.i tavla fi la lojban ri]], an in-progress list of easy-to-use vocabulary intended to facilitate talking about Lojban in Lojban.
| | I secondly propose that {ka} could be redefined as equivalent to |
| * There is a [http://www.lojban.org/files/roadmap.html#draft-textbook raft textbook] by [[User:Bob LeChevalier|Bob LeChevalier]], which hasn't been updated in a very long time.
| |
|
| |
|
| == Learning Materials Wish-List ==
| | {kai'i}. |
|
| |
|
| * [[jbocre: introductory reader|introductory reader]]
| | ---- |
| * [[jbocre: better flashcard program|better flashcard program]]
| |
[[jbocre: mi'e [jbocre: And|And]]
Superseded by poi'i.
Speculatively proposed in [1], repeated here:
Recent distinct threads have established
(a) that {ka} is redundant, since {du'u} can serve all the
functions of current {ka}
(b) that there is a need to be able to define reflexive
selbri that can function as sumti tails, analgously to
{da noi ke'a ke'a lumci} = "something that *self-washes*".
I first propose a NU, {kai'i}, meaning "ckaji (be le ka)".
Then
da noi ke'a ke'a lumci
= lo kai'i ce'u ce'u lumci
= lo ckaji be tu'o du'u ce'u ce'u lumci
And more generally:
lo broda
= da noi ke'a broda
= lo kai'i ce'u broda
= lo ckaji be tu'o du'u ce'u broda
da noi mi djuno tu'o du'u ke'a broda
= lo kai'i mi djuno tu'o du'u ce'u broda
= lo ckaji be tu'o du'u mi djuno tu'o du'u ce'u broda
I secondly propose that {ka} could be redefined as equivalent to
{kai'i}.