joi: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
''Non-logical connective. Joins the preceding argument and the following argument, with-result: a '''gunma'''.'' | ''Non-logical connective. Joins the preceding argument and the following argument, with-result: a '''gunma'''.'' | ||
This is compatible with the BPFK definition above (whew!) | This is compatible with the BPFK definition above (whew!) when taking the resulting '''gunma''' to satisfy '''gunma le li'erla'i .e le se li'erla'i'''. | ||
=broda joi brodu= | =broda joi brodu= | ||
Revision as of 14:43, 28 October 2018
BPFK Sections
- BPFK_Section:_Non-logical_Connectives#cmavo:_joi_.28JOI.29
- BPFK_Section:_Non-logical_Connectives#Formal_definitions
- X joi Y = lo gunma be X .e Y
CLL 14.14 Non-logical connectives
(Link added for reference — but all the usual disclaimers apply: CLL says quite contradictory things about joi and jo'u.)
gimste definition
non-logical connective: mixed conjunction; 'and' meaning 'mixed together', forming a mass.
la lalxu's diagram
xorxes's Lojban jbovlaste definition
nalylogji jonma'o .i te jorne le li'erla'i le se li'erla'i ja'e lo gunma
Non-logical connective. Joins the preceding argument and the following argument, with-result: a gunma.
This is compatible with the BPFK definition above (whew!) when taking the resulting gunma to satisfy gunma le li'erla'i .e le se li'erla'i.
broda joi brodu
That definition is fine for SUMTI joi SUMTI, but what about tanru units? The resulting broda joi brodu can't be a gunma (mass).
la .uakci suggests the following semantics:
«da broda joi brodu» → 1) da broda i je da brodu; 2) su’o di zo’u da ckaji di i je lo ka broda kei je lo ka brodu cu pagbu di; 2a) lo ka broda kei je lo ka brodu cu simsa di; 2b) lo ka broda je brodu na du di.