jbovlaste import FrontPage lang de: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
m (Text replace - "jbocre: ([a-z])" to "$1")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


The proposal is this:
== Hauptseite ==


la fred goi ko'a klama .i la djan goi ko'a klama ''means that fred and djan are the same, and that they are refered to as ko'a.''
Willkommen in jbovlaste, dem lojban-Wörterbuch!


la fred goi ko'a klama .i la djan goi'a ko'a klama ''means that in the second bridi, ko'a is reassigned and now refers to djan, but does not say that djan is fred.''
Wenn du nicht weist was lojban ist, eine gute und ausfühliche Beschreibung gibt dir die [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lojban ikipedia]


Thus, the [[jbocre: goi|goi]] page is correct, as is the book (as I understand it); and we also get to reassign just one ko'a-series cmavo.
==== Alphabet und Aussprache ====


mi'e. [[jbocre: .kreig.daniyl.|.kreig.daniyl.]]
* [[jbovlaste import: Alphabet und Aussprache lang de]]


What would be handier (and possibly already exists) would be a mechanism to unbind a single bound variable.  I say this because reassigning ko'as isn't the only reason you'd want to be able to do this (besides, it isn't like there are so few ko'as that you should ever need to rebind them much, [[jbocre: lerfu pro-sumti, and why ko'a sucks f you use lerfu|lerfu pro-sumti, and why ko'a sucks f you use lerfu]].)  What I see happen much more is overbinding of {da}.  People get so hung up on ''da''=something and ''roda''=everything that it's hard to remember that once you've said ''roda poi X...'' if you talk about ''da'' or ''roda'' again right away, you're still bound in that subset of ''da'', and suddenly ''roda'' doesn't mean "everything" anymore and you have to remember to say ''rode'' and so on.  ''--mi'e mark.''
==== Grammatik ====


''Hence the utility of dada'o.''
* [[jbovlaste import: Grundliegende Grammatik lang de]]


Indeed.  I therefore propose that ''da'o'' be used to specify assymetry in ''goi'' and ''cei'' assignments.  Whichever element is da'o-ed is considered to be cleared out and overwritten by the new value.  This may well mean redefining ''da'o'', which I think currently means "undefine everything."  For that meaning, I propose ''da'oda'o''.  DAhO has the same grammar as UI, near enough, so it can be considered to attach to things.  ''da'o'' outside of goi/cei will retain the meaning of undefining whatever it's attached to.  This, I think, is a pretty small change, not really munging baseline badly, and certainly it accords with grammar.  And I think it neatly solves several problems at once.  ''--mi'e mark''
==== Terminologieseiten ====


I second. DAhO is another example of a selma'o that should not exist. Apparently the only difference with UI is that ''da'onai'' is not allowed, but it has a very useful meaning: when you want to emphasize that you are '''not''' undefining something. So, whenever it is pertinent, ''da'o'' should be moved to UI. --mi'e [[User:xorxes|xorxes]] ''My ma'oste says nai negates the last word, whatever that may be.''  That's as may be, but the ''grammar'' does not permit a ''nai'' after ''da'o''.  Putting one there would be like putting a ''nai'' in some random place in the sentence, which may or may not be legal, and even if legal, would technically negate the word before the ''da'o'', probably.
* [[jbovlaste import: Alltagssprache lang de]]


All selma'o should [[jbocre: dies in the arse ie in the arse|dies in the arse ie in the arse]]. The x2 of cmavo is for the function of the word. Saying ''it's a UI'' doesn't tell me what it does. It could say how the speaker feels, or it could make the bridi a question. The ''se cmavo'' should be a description of the function of the cmavo, as the place structure demands. Treating UI as a valid ''se cmavo'' is simply a rejection of the place structure. Calling da'o a UI would make it even stupider. BTW, can you really say ''da'ocai''? - mi'e. [[jbocre: .kreig.daniyl.|.kreig.daniyl.]]
* [[jbovlaste import: Kulturen lang de]]
* [[jbovlaste import: Maße lang de]]


In what sense of 'can'? It is grammatical, if that's what you're asking. It doesn't matter much whether you use the word ''selma'o'' to refer to grammar classes or you use some other word. It is still useful to classify words according to what grammatical structures they're allowed to form. You can use ''xu'' in exactly the same places where you can use ''ui'', that's why they're in the same class, that's all. That's quite independent of their meaning. Even though there is some correlation between meaning and grammar classes, it is not at all absolute. Lojban has way too many grammar classes (usually called ''selma'o''), a lot more than it needs. --mi'e [[User:xorxes|xorxes]]
* [[jbovlaste import: Emotionen lang de]]
* [[jbovlaste import: Farben lang de]]
 
* [[jbovlaste import: Kalender lang de]]
* [[jbovlaste import: Datumsangaben lang de]]
 
* [[jbovlaste import: Himmelsrichtungen lang de]]
* [[jbovlaste import: das Periodensystem der Elemente lang de]]
 
* [[jbovlaste import: Computer-Fachbegrife lang de]]
* [[jbovlaste import: Taxonomie lang de]] (Klassifizierung von Lebewesen)
 
* [[jbovlaste import: Wissenschaften lang de]]
* [[jbovlaste import: Nähhandwerk lang de]]
 
* [[jbovlaste import: Fachausdrücke aus Robin's Schriftstücken lang de]]
 
==== Wie du helfen kannst ====
 
Diese Seite befindet sich noch stark im Aufbau, Mithilfe ist herzlich eingeladen.
 
* Falls du Englisch und Deutsch kannst, währe es am besten wenn du dir einen Account registrierst und ein wenig übersetzen hilfst
 
== test ==
 
=== test ===
 
==== test ====
 
===== test =====

Latest revision as of 14:45, 23 March 2014