jai'i: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Gleki moved page jbocre: jai'i to jai'i without leaving a redirect: Text replace - "jbocre: ([a-z])" to "$1") |
m (Text replace - "jbocre: " to "") |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Shouldn't ''jai'i'' be in selma'o JAI? (Not to mention that it isn't neccesary, but I wondered why you had chosen SE) --mi'e [[ | Shouldn't ''jai'i'' be in selma'o JAI? (Not to mention that it isn't neccesary, but I wondered why you had chosen SE) --mi'e [[.djorden.|.djorden.]] | ||
* I can't remember now, & it doesn't seem worthwhile reconstructing my reasoning, given that ''jai'i'' isn't needed. --[[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]] | * I can't remember now, & it doesn't seem worthwhile reconstructing my reasoning, given that ''jai'i'' isn't needed. --[[User:And Rosta|And Rosta]] | ||
Revision as of 16:21, 23 March 2014
jai'i SE
fai'i FA
jai'i:
Move old x1 to fai'i-tagged place. New x1 is sumti raised out of fai'i-tagged old x1.
Works like jai broda, except that it allows jai BAI jai'i broda ... fai ko'a ... fai'i ko'e.
--And Rosta.
xorxes comments:
- jai BAI jai broda is already allowed. I suppose you can use jai, jaixipa, fai, faixipa if you need to.
Shouldn't jai'i be in selma'o JAI? (Not to mention that it isn't neccesary, but I wondered why you had chosen SE) --mi'e .djorden.
- I can't remember now, & it doesn't seem worthwhile reconstructing my reasoning, given that jai'i isn't needed. --And Rosta