dubious conjecture

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

I have long suspected that zodiacal astrology contains an anticipation of neoJungian typology; that the signs of the zodiac represent types (or pairs of types); that a person can be born to any "sign" on any day; & that the positions of the planets are used as "fudge factors". (This puts me at odds with astrology buffs, who want a science with plug-in answers, & with psychologists, who prefer to avoid any contamination from the "occult"...) Anyway, this is what i came up with-- Aries ISTP, Taurus ESTJ, Gemini INTP, Cancer ESFJ, Leo ENTJ, Virgo ISFP, Libra INFP, Scorpio INTJ, Sagittarius ESTP & ESFP, Capricorn ISTJ & ISFJ, Aquarius ENFP & ENTP, Pisces ENFJ & INFJ. Why bother? Because some of the writing on astrology (particularly the sign & sign compatibility analyses) contains insights that Myers-Briggs writing doesn't. (Of course, a lot of it is poppycock, too.) The spiritual side, as well, is not neglected.


.ui .i'e .i mi cmima la'o xy. Sag EN-p .xy .i mi'e xod


Odd coincidence. I'm actually a Scorpio and INTJ. But anyway, what does this have to do with Lojban? --tsali

See le mi naljbo -- nitcion (where mi is not me...)


I am a virgo and INTP. -- TheodoreReed