considered harmful: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Gleki moved page jbocre: considered harmful to considered harmful without leaving a redirect: Text replace - "jbocre: c" to "c")
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Yet another allusion to computer lore; in this case, [http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/UTCS/report/1994/profiles/dijkstra.html Edsgr Dijkstra]'s 1968 notorious polemic paper ''[http://courses.cs.vt.edu/~cs1104/Introduction/Dijkstra.goto.html GOTO statement considered harmful]'', which launched a revolution in structured programming. The phrase is used when someone knows they are saying something which may prove portentous - but is likelier to be regarded as pontifficating.


Yet another allusion to computer lore; in this case, [http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/UTCS/report/1994/profiles/dijkstra.html dsgr Dijkstra]'s 1968 notorious polemic paper ''[http://courses.cs.vt.edu/~cs1104/Introduction/Dijkstra.goto.html OTO statement considered harmful]'', which launched a revolution in structured programming. The phrase is used when someone knows they are saying something which may prove portentous --- but is likelier to be regarded as pontifficating.
See also [http://catb.org/esr/jargon/html/C/considered-harmful.html Jargon File entry].
 
See also Jargon File entry: http://catb.org/esr/jargon/html/C/considered-harmful.html

Latest revision as of 16:46, 26 March 2016

Yet another allusion to computer lore; in this case, Edsgr Dijkstra's 1968 notorious polemic paper GOTO statement considered harmful, which launched a revolution in structured programming. The phrase is used when someone knows they are saying something which may prove portentous - but is likelier to be regarded as pontifficating.

See also Jargon File entry.