Writing algorithms in Lojban: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Attempt at translating a piece of C code to Lojban: Fixing the formatting) |
|||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
'''Lojban translation (to be improved)''' | '''Lojban translation (to be improved):''' | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
.i ko'oi zilxru gi'e pruce fi la lerpoi | .i ko'oi zilxru gi'e pruce fi la lerpoi | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
'''To be improved:''' | |||
1) {la broda cu du li re} is probably not right; perhaps {la'e la broda} would be better for refering to the variable value. | |||
2) "jo" is perhaps wrong for "if...then". | |||
3) {dubze'a} is probably nonsensical, it should be replaced with something else. :) |
Revision as of 17:10, 23 July 2014
Attempt at translating a piece of C code to Lojban
char* str_fill(char string[], char filling, uint_t count) { if (string) { if (!count) while(string[count]) count++; string[count] = '\0'; while (count--) string[count] = filling; } return string; }
English translation:
Function str_fill returning char pointer, taking parameters: 'string', of type char array; 'filling', of type char; 'count', of type uint_t. Variable list: empty. Instruction list: if 'string' is not equal to 0: > if 'count' is equal to 0: > > as long as the offset number 'count' of the array 'string' is not equal to 0: > > > we add 1 to 'count' > we set the offset number 'count' of the array 'string' to 0 > as long as 'count' is not equal to 0: > > we substract 1 from 'count' > > we copy 'filling' into the offset number 'count' of the array 'string' we return to the calling function giving the value 'string' End of function.
Lojban translation (to be improved):
ni'o ni'o ca'e pruce fa la lerpoiclugau fo di'e fe la lerpoi noi me'oi .char. judri ce'o la selclu noi me'oi .char. ce'o la selzilkancu noi me'oi .uint_t. fi lo me'oi .char. judri ni'o to ve pruce liste toi la lerpoi na du li no .i jo tu'e { > la selzilkancu cu du li no .i jo tu'e { > > lo me la selzilkancu moi be la lerpoi na du li no .i jo > > ko'oi rapli co'u lo nu ja'a go'i ku fa lo nu > > ko'oi la selzilkancu cu dubze'a li pa > } tu'u > .i la selzilkancu na du li no .i jo > ko'oi rapli co'u lo nu ja'a go'i ku fa lo nu > ge ko'oi la selzilkancu cu dubjdika li pa > gi ko'oi lo me la selzilkancu moi be la lerpoi cu fukpi la selclu } tu'u .i ko'oi zilxru gi'e pruce fi la lerpoi
To be improved: 1) {la broda cu du li re} is probably not right; perhaps {la'e la broda} would be better for refering to the variable value. 2) "jo" is perhaps wrong for "if...then". 3) {dubze'a} is probably nonsensical, it should be replaced with something else. :)