User:Ramcinfo/logji staile: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
cu me'au la kancu me'u | cu me'au la kancu me'u | ||
lo kutpoi | lo kutpoi | ||
lo'oi ke'a sumji li pa | lo'oi ke'a sumji li pa | ||
lo me'au la kancu me'u be da ku'au | lo me'au la kancu me'u be da ku'au | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Equivalent definitions in Prolog and Erlang: http://danlucraft.com/blog/2007/08/comparing-erlang-and-prolog/ | Equivalent definitions in Prolog and Erlang: http://danlucraft.com/blog/2007/08/comparing-erlang-and-prolog/ | ||
See also: http://hyperpolyglot.org/logic | |||
I have doubts of defining sequence of single undefined element as {vu'i zo'e} — couldn’t zo'e be e.g. a set with cardinality > 1? | |||
Latest revision as of 02:54, 5 March 2015
staile inspired by programming languages Prolog and Erlang.
li no
cu me'au la kancu me'u
lo kutpoi
lo'oi ke'a sumji li pa
lo me'au la kancu me'u be da ku'au
cu me'au la kancu me'u
lo'oi ke'a konkatena vu'i zo'e da ku'au
Equivalent definitions in Prolog and Erlang: http://danlucraft.com/blog/2007/08/comparing-erlang-and-prolog/
See also: http://hyperpolyglot.org/logic
I have doubts of defining sequence of single undefined element as {vu'i zo'e} — couldn’t zo'e be e.g. a set with cardinality > 1?