Difference between revisions of "User:Jezrax"

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "jbocre: s" to "s")
m (Text replace - "jbocre: p" to "p")
Line 12: Line 12:
 
* [[jbocre: LojbanAphorisms|LojbanAphorisms]]
 
* [[jbocre: LojbanAphorisms|LojbanAphorisms]]
  
* [[jbocre: put out your eyes as if they were a fire|put out your eyes as if they were a fire]]
+
* [[put out your eyes as if they were a fire|put out your eyes as if they were a fire]]
 
* [[jbocre: zo'e broda gi'e brode|zo'e broda gi'e brode]]
 
* [[jbocre: zo'e broda gi'e brode|zo'e broda gi'e brode]]
  
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
* [[jbocre: observatives are not irregular rant|observatives are not irregular rant]]
 
* [[jbocre: observatives are not irregular rant|observatives are not irregular rant]]
* [[jbocre: pilno rant|pilno rant]]
+
* [[pilno rant|pilno rant]]
  
 
==== lobjo fi'e mi ====
 
==== lobjo fi'e mi ====
Line 59: Line 59:
 
* Tinkering with the language tends to damage the community. Even arguing about tinkering with the language is bad. Seeing the debates nearly drove me away before I'd even finished learning the [[jbocre: gismu|gismu]].
 
* Tinkering with the language tends to damage the community. Even arguing about tinkering with the language is bad. Seeing the debates nearly drove me away before I'd even finished learning the [[jbocre: gismu|gismu]].
  
* I ignore experimental words and proposed changes in meaning or [[jbocre: place structure|place structure]], and discussions of them.
+
* I ignore experimental words and proposed changes in meaning or [[place structure|place structure]], and discussions of them.
 
** ''[[jbocre: Experimental cmavo|Experimental cmavo]] are officially part of the language. Do you ignore all of them too?''
 
** ''[[jbocre: Experimental cmavo|Experimental cmavo]] are officially part of the language. Do you ignore all of them too?''
  

Revision as of 12:13, 23 March 2014

http://satirist.org/

  • Favorite word is still: ti'icki
  • Second-favorite word: zbaske
    • I invented this word to translate "technology", then discovered that nitcion had already used it to translate "engineering".

ca'o cinri mi

rants

lobjo fi'e mi

  • [1] - cnino xe fanva de'i li 2002;1;6

naljbo fi'e mi

ba'o] vajni

I am not on any of the mailing lists, because I carelessly read yahoo's "privacy" policy first. .i u'e mi bebna But I check the web archives regularly.


I largely agree with Jay Kominek about Lojban policy.

  • Long live the baseline.
  • Tinkering with the language tends to damage the community. Even arguing about tinkering with the language is bad. Seeing the debates nearly drove me away before I'd even finished learning the gismu.
  • I ignore experimental words and proposed changes in meaning or place structure, and discussions of them.
      • Calling them a part of the language is arguable. A portion of cmavo space is set aside for them. Nothing is defined in it. You can say that experimental cmavo are a part of the language, but can you say xa'o is officially part of the language (truthfully)?
        • No. However, certain experimental cmavo and other unofficial constructs are used, and thus (tavlykai that I am) I would call them part of the language as it is actually spoken. For example, ka'enai is definitely part of the language - even though the book thinks otherwise. - mi'e. .kreig.daniyl.
        • How many people have to start using and understanding xa'o before you'll consider it part of the language? Now, ka'enai is a good example of the actual language diverging from the baseline.
      • Yes, I ignore them. I don't know any of them or feel a need to. I haven't found anything I want to say that seems to call for additional cmavo. mi'e jezrax