Difference between revisions of "User:Jezrax"

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "jbocre: ([A-K])" to "$1")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
http://satirist.org/
 
 
 
* Favorite word is still: '''ti'icki'''
 
* Favorite word is still: '''ti'icki'''
 
* Second-favorite word: '''zbaske'''
 
* Second-favorite word: '''zbaske'''
 
 
** I invented this word to translate "technology", then discovered that [[User:Nick Nicholas|nitcion]] had already used it to translate "engineering".
 
** I invented this word to translate "technology", then discovered that [[User:Nick Nicholas|nitcion]] had already used it to translate "engineering".
  
==== ca'o cinri mi ====
+
= ca'o cinri mi =
 
 
 
* [[gismu that are hard to decipher|gismu that are hard to decipher]]
 
* [[gismu that are hard to decipher|gismu that are hard to decipher]]
 
* [[LojbanAphorisms|LojbanAphorisms]]
 
* [[LojbanAphorisms|LojbanAphorisms]]
 
 
* [[put out your eyes as if they were a fire|put out your eyes as if they were a fire]]
 
* [[put out your eyes as if they were a fire|put out your eyes as if they were a fire]]
 
* [[zo'e broda gi'e brode|zo'e broda gi'e brode]]
 
* [[zo'e broda gi'e brode|zo'e broda gi'e brode]]
 
 
* [[stura le'i vo preti be le za'i smuni|stura le'i vo preti be le za'i smuni]]
 
* [[stura le'i vo preti be le za'i smuni|stura le'i vo preti be le za'i smuni]]
 
* [[abstractors with SE and connectives|abstractors with SE and connectives]]
 
* [[abstractors with SE and connectives|abstractors with SE and connectives]]
 
 
* [[breakdowns of audiovisual isomorphism|breakdowns of audiovisual isomorphism]]
 
* [[breakdowns of audiovisual isomorphism|breakdowns of audiovisual isomorphism]]
 
* [[random lujvo|random lujvo]]
 
* [[random lujvo|random lujvo]]
  
==== [[rants|rants]] ====
+
= [[rants]] =
 
 
 
* [[tanru versus lujvo rant|tanru versus lujvo rant]]
 
* [[tanru versus lujvo rant|tanru versus lujvo rant]]
 
* [[tanru are not metaphors rant|tanru are not metaphors rant]]
 
* [[tanru are not metaphors rant|tanru are not metaphors rant]]
 
 
* [[observatives are not irregular rant|observatives are not irregular rant]]
 
* [[observatives are not irregular rant|observatives are not irregular rant]]
 
* [[pilno rant|pilno rant]]
 
* [[pilno rant|pilno rant]]
 
+
= lo lojbo poi finti fa mi =
==== lobjo fi'e mi ====
+
* http://www.livejournal.com/users/jezrax/
 
+
* http://satirist.org/lojban/
* [http://www.livejournal.com/users/jezrax/
+
* http://satirist.org/lojban/cuvjbo/balfihe/ - '''cnino xe fanva de'i li 2002;1;6'''
*] http://satirist.org/lojban/
+
= lo na'e lojbo poi finti fa mi=
 
+
* the Daily Whale - http://satirist.org/whale/
* [http://satirist.org/lojban/cuvjbo/balfihe/] - ''cnino xe fanva de'i li 2002;1;6''
+
* Machine Learning in Games - http://satirist.org/learn-game/
 
+
= ba'o vajni =
==== naljbo fi'e mi ====
 
 
 
* the Daily Whale - [http://satirist.org/whale/
 
*] Machine Learning in Games - [http://satirist.org/learn-game/
 
 
 
==== ba'o] vajni ====
 
 
 
 
* What is a good [[lujvo for aphorism|lujvo for aphorism]] or epigram?
 
* What is a good [[lujvo for aphorism|lujvo for aphorism]] or epigram?
* [[is this correct|is this correct]]
+
* [[How to say it in Lojban|is this correct]]
 
 
 
* [[English-ish rafsi|English-ish rafsi]]
 
* [[English-ish rafsi|English-ish rafsi]]
 
 
I am not on any of the mailing lists, because I carelessly read yahoo's "privacy" policy first. ''.i u'e mi bebna'' But I check the web archives regularly.
 
I am not on any of the mailing lists, because I carelessly read yahoo's "privacy" policy first. ''.i u'e mi bebna'' But I check the web archives regularly.
 
 
* see [[mailing list hosting|mailing list hosting]] - moving away from Yahoo
 
* see [[mailing list hosting|mailing list hosting]] - moving away from Yahoo
 
+
=pe mi=
----
 
 
 
 
I largely agree with [[Jay Kominek|Jay Kominek]] about Lojban policy.
 
I largely agree with [[Jay Kominek|Jay Kominek]] about Lojban policy.
 
 
* Long live the baseline.
 
* Long live the baseline.
 
* Tinkering with the language tends to damage the community. Even arguing about tinkering with the language is bad. Seeing the debates nearly drove me away before I'd even finished learning the [[gismu|gismu]].
 
* Tinkering with the language tends to damage the community. Even arguing about tinkering with the language is bad. Seeing the debates nearly drove me away before I'd even finished learning the [[gismu|gismu]].
 
 
* I ignore experimental words and proposed changes in meaning or [[place structure|place structure]], and discussions of them.
 
* I ignore experimental words and proposed changes in meaning or [[place structure|place structure]], and discussions of them.
** ''[[Experimental cmavo|Experimental cmavo]] are officially part of the language. Do you ignore all of them too?''
+
** [[Experimental cmavo|Experimental cmavo]] are officially part of the language. Do you ignore all of them too?
 
+
*** jezrax:
*** Calling them a part of the language is arguable. A portion of cmavo space is set aside for them. Nothing is defined in it. You can say that experimental cmavo are a part of the language, but can you say ''xa'o'' is officially part of the language (truthfully)?
+
**** Calling them a part of the language is arguable. A portion of cmavo space is set aside for them. Nothing is defined in it. You can say that experimental cmavo are a part of the language, but can you say ''xa'o'' is officially part of the language (truthfully)?
**** ''No. However, certain experimental cmavo and other unofficial constructs are used, and thus (tavlykai that I am) I would call them part of the language as it is actually spoken. For example, ''ka'enai'' is definitely part of the language - even though the book thinks otherwise. - mi'e. [[jbocre: .kreig.daniyl.|.kreig.daniyl.]]''
+
***** [[.kreig.daniyl.|.kreig.daniyl.]]:
 +
****** No. However, certain experimental cmavo and other unofficial constructs are used, and thus ('''tavlykai''' that I am) I would call them part of the language as it is actually spoken. For example, '''ka'enai''' is definitely part of the language - even though the book thinks otherwise.
 +
***** How many people have to start using and understanding '''xa'o''' before you'll consider it part of the language? Now, '''ka'enai''' is a good example of the actual language diverging from the baseline.
 +
***jezrax:
 +
***:Yes, I ignore them. I don't know any of them or feel a need to. I haven't found anything I want to say that seems to call for additional cmavo.
 +
* [[User:Bob LeChevalier|Bob LeChevalier]] is usually correct.
  
**** How many people have to start using and understanding ''xa'o'' before you'll consider it part of the language? Now, ''ka'enai'' is a good example of the actual language diverging from the baseline.
+
=Website=
*** Yes, I ignore them. I don't know any of them or feel a need to. I haven't found anything I want to say that seems to call for additional ''cmavo''. ''mi'e jezrax''
+
*http://satirist.org/
 
 
* [[User:Bob LeChevalier|Bob LeChevalier]] is usually correct.
 

Latest revision as of 10:54, 2 September 2014

  • Favorite word is still: ti'icki
  • Second-favorite word: zbaske
    • I invented this word to translate "technology", then discovered that nitcion had already used it to translate "engineering".

ca'o cinri mi

rants

lo lojbo poi finti fa mi

lo na'e lojbo poi finti fa mi

ba'o vajni

I am not on any of the mailing lists, because I carelessly read yahoo's "privacy" policy first. .i u'e mi bebna But I check the web archives regularly.

pe mi

I largely agree with Jay Kominek about Lojban policy.

  • Long live the baseline.
  • Tinkering with the language tends to damage the community. Even arguing about tinkering with the language is bad. Seeing the debates nearly drove me away before I'd even finished learning the gismu.
  • I ignore experimental words and proposed changes in meaning or place structure, and discussions of them.
    • Experimental cmavo are officially part of the language. Do you ignore all of them too?
      • jezrax:
        • Calling them a part of the language is arguable. A portion of cmavo space is set aside for them. Nothing is defined in it. You can say that experimental cmavo are a part of the language, but can you say xa'o is officially part of the language (truthfully)?
          • .kreig.daniyl.:
            • No. However, certain experimental cmavo and other unofficial constructs are used, and thus (tavlykai that I am) I would call them part of the language as it is actually spoken. For example, ka'enai is definitely part of the language - even though the book thinks otherwise.
          • How many people have to start using and understanding xa'o before you'll consider it part of the language? Now, ka'enai is a good example of the actual language diverging from the baseline.
      • jezrax:
        Yes, I ignore them. I don't know any of them or feel a need to. I haven't found anything I want to say that seems to call for additional cmavo.
  • Bob LeChevalier is usually correct.

Website