Talk:LLG members
By 'competence', does the article necessarily require the member-elect to be a professional in the field, or just to be interested in and knowledgible about it?
mu'omi'e JEsikas.
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 13:55 -0800, [email protected] wrote: > Re: LLG Members > By 'competence', does the article necessarily require the member-elect to be a professional in the field, or just to be interested in and knowledgible about it? > > mu'omi'e JEsikas.
I'd say having demonstrated ability. I'm still not sure what field I was nominated in. I assume it's Computer Science. While I do deal with computers an awful lot at work now, I'm still far from a "Computer Professional" by most ideas of what that means. However, I have written an IRC bot to play lojban games, and I'm the maintainer of the jbofihe package in Debian. (Although only the former was true when I was offered the position.)
mu'omi'e.bancus
On 11/10/05, [email protected] wrote: > Re: LLG Members > By 'competence', does the article necessarily require the member-elect to be a professional in the field, or just to be interested in and knowledgible about it? > > mu'omi'e JEsikas.
There is no requirement for being a professional in any field, and no kind of competence in those fields has ever been an issue in practice. More important is your commitment to the advancement of the language.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:55:13PM -0800, [email protected] wrote: > By 'competence', does the article necessarily require the > member-elect to be a professional in the field, or just to be > interested in and knowledgible about it? > > mu'omi'e JEsikas.
I don't think that test has ever been enforced. Even if it was, surely being well informed would be sufficient, however acquired.
-Robin