Talk:LFK Dictionary Project: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "= Dictionary name = How about just {vlacku}? The word {vlaselcku} is currently undefined, and I doubt "words within a dictionary" is a concept worth a dedicated lexeme. If {s...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Dictionary name = | == Dictionary name == | ||
How about just {vlacku}? The word {vlaselcku} is currently undefined, and I doubt "words within a dictionary" is a concept worth a dedicated lexeme. If {se} is needed, then {se vlacku} would be the way to go IMHO. | How about just {vlacku}? The word {vlaselcku} is currently undefined, and I doubt "words within a dictionary" is a concept worth a dedicated lexeme. If {se} is needed, then {se vlacku} would be the way to go IMHO. [-Ilmen] | ||
* Sounds good. There is a distinction between {cukta} and {se cukta}; the first is a book as a container and the second is a book as content. (Xorxes drew this distinction years ago on the list, mentioning that it's made in Spanish, and it sorta stuck with me). But it's hard to separate one from the other, so why not just go with {vlacku} [[User:Maik|Maik]] ([[User talk:Maik|talk]]) 18:45, 7 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:45, 7 February 2020
Dictionary name
How about just {vlacku}? The word {vlaselcku} is currently undefined, and I doubt "words within a dictionary" is a concept worth a dedicated lexeme. If {se} is needed, then {se vlacku} would be the way to go IMHO. [-Ilmen]
- Sounds good. There is a distinction between {cukta} and {se cukta}; the first is a book as a container and the second is a book as content. (Xorxes drew this distinction years ago on the list, mentioning that it's made in Spanish, and it sorta stuck with me). But it's hard to separate one from the other, so why not just go with {vlacku} Maik (talk) 18:45, 7 February 2020 (UTC)