Proposal: Drag-and-Drop Conversion Becomes Default: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Krtisfranks (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The idea would be to redefine: * new-"te" to mean old-"{{jvs|to'ai}}", and new-"to'ai" to mean old-"te"; * new-"ve" to mean old-"{{jvs|vo'ai}}", and new-"vo'ai" to mean old-"v...") Tags: mobile edit mobile web edit |
Krtisfranks (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The idea would be to redefine: | The idea would be to redefine: | ||
* new-"te" to mean old-"{{jvs|to'ai}}", and new-"to'ai" to mean old-"te"; | * new-"te" so as to mean old-"{{jvs|to'ai}}", and new-"to'ai" so as to mean old-"te"; | ||
* new-"ve" to mean old-"{{jvs|vo'ai}}", and new-"vo'ai" to mean old-"ve"; | ** Thus, if this proposal were to be adopted (so all words would have their new meanings) and | ||
* new-"xe" to mean old-"{{jvs|xo'ai}}", and new-"xo'ai" to mean old-"xe". | **: if the original selbri had its sumti slots ordered as: x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ..., then: | ||
**: "te" would drag-and-drop the third sumti slot to the first position, resulting in ordering: x3 x1 x2 x4 x5 ...; | |||
**: and "to'ai" would transpose the third and first sumti slot with one another, resulting in ordering: x3 x2 x1 x4 x5 ... | |||
* new-"ve" so as to mean old-"{{jvs|vo'ai}}", and new-"vo'ai" so as to mean old-"ve"; | |||
* new-"xe" so as to mean old-"{{jvs|xo'ai}}", and new-"xo'ai" so as to mean old-"xe". | |||
Additionally: | |||
* "se" would be unaffected. | * "se" would be unaffected. | ||
* The rafsi would remain associated with the word/word form/string with which they share | * The rafsi would remain associated with the word/word form/string with which they share their first vowels, so their meanings would be redefined (but their assignment wrt word/word form/string would be unchanged). | ||
** Thus, for example: new-"-ter-" would be assigned to new-"te" and would mean old-"to'ai"/old-"-toz-" (if that rafsi is accepted); new-"-toz-" would be assigned to new-"to'ai" and would mean old-"te"/old-"-ter-". Etc. | ** Thus, for example: new-"-ter-" would be assigned to new-"te" and would mean old-"to'ai"/old-"-toz-" (if that rafsi is accepted); new-"-toz-" would be assigned to new-"to'ai" and would mean old-"te"/old-"-ter-". Etc. for the other conversions. As such: | ||
**: "terbroda" would decompose to "te broda" and would have ordering: x3 x1 x2 x4 x5 ...; | |||
**: meanwhile, "tozbroda" would decompose to "to'ai broda" and would have ordering: x3 x2 x1 x4 x5 ... | |||
*** If the rafsi for "te" becomes "-tel-", then exchange "-ter-" with "-tel-" throughout this example. | *** If the rafsi for "te" becomes "-tel-", then exchange "-ter-" with "-tel-" throughout this example. | ||
** Therefore, "-sel-" (assigned to "se") would be unaffected. | |||
Latest revision as of 19:31, 9 September 2018
The idea would be to redefine:
- new-"te" so as to mean old-"to'ai", and new-"to'ai" so as to mean old-"te";
- Thus, if this proposal were to be adopted (so all words would have their new meanings) and
- if the original selbri had its sumti slots ordered as: x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ..., then:
- "te" would drag-and-drop the third sumti slot to the first position, resulting in ordering: x3 x1 x2 x4 x5 ...;
- and "to'ai" would transpose the third and first sumti slot with one another, resulting in ordering: x3 x2 x1 x4 x5 ...
- Thus, if this proposal were to be adopted (so all words would have their new meanings) and
- new-"ve" so as to mean old-"vo'ai", and new-"vo'ai" so as to mean old-"ve";
- new-"xe" so as to mean old-"xo'ai", and new-"xo'ai" so as to mean old-"xe".
Additionally:
- "se" would be unaffected.
- The rafsi would remain associated with the word/word form/string with which they share their first vowels, so their meanings would be redefined (but their assignment wrt word/word form/string would be unchanged).
- Thus, for example: new-"-ter-" would be assigned to new-"te" and would mean old-"to'ai"/old-"-toz-" (if that rafsi is accepted); new-"-toz-" would be assigned to new-"to'ai" and would mean old-"te"/old-"-ter-". Etc. for the other conversions. As such:
- "terbroda" would decompose to "te broda" and would have ordering: x3 x1 x2 x4 x5 ...;
- meanwhile, "tozbroda" would decompose to "to'ai broda" and would have ordering: x3 x2 x1 x4 x5 ...
- If the rafsi for "te" becomes "-tel-", then exchange "-ter-" with "-tel-" throughout this example.
- Therefore, "-sel-" (assigned to "se") would be unaffected.
- Thus, for example: new-"-ter-" would be assigned to new-"te" and would mean old-"to'ai"/old-"-toz-" (if that rafsi is accepted); new-"-toz-" would be assigned to new-"to'ai" and would mean old-"te"/old-"-ter-". Etc. for the other conversions. As such:
This would require a substantial reworking of lujvo.
It might be worth it, though, if we feel that drag-and-drop conversion is easier/requires less brain-power or is more natural. Note that rafsi ending in "l" or "r" are more coveted than those which end in "z".