New Growth Lojbanists: Difference between revisions

From Lojban
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A class of [[JboPre|Lojbanist]]s arbitrarily defined by [[User:Nick Nicholas|Nick Nicholas]] as "anyone who joined Lojban after he left it for his PhD". (i.e. 1994)
[[jbocre: The Lojban MOO|The Lojban MOO]]
* [[User:Nick Nicholas|nitcion]]:
 
** Thanks, Jay! :-) But I do think there is a legitimate distinction to be drawn between the sundry waves of Lojbanists, particularly in terms of social dynamics.
Please add new lines to the ''top'' of the table.
 
||'''Date'''|'''Location/Object'''|'''Text'''|'''Comment'''|'''Suggestion'''|'''Corrected'''
 
25 July 2006|{do zvati le barda je loldi be no cinri be'o foldi}|{do zvati le barda je loldi be no cinri be'o foldi}|one odd sumti & one typo?|{do zvati le ke barda je pinta je narcinri ke'e foldi}|
 
24 July 2006|"le purdi"|'''.i no'e kijyfusra sfofa noi...'''|{sfofa} makes me think of a couch, which is odd in a garden.|{stizu} or {ta'orstizu}|
 
24 July 2006|"le purdi"|'''.i ni'u bo cukla foldi...'''|{ni'u} seems like a typo?|Maybe {ni'a}?|
 
16 Jan 2006|''le xarmunje gunstu pe la camgusmis.''|'''.i manku ke cnita kumfa ke'e ja rokci kevna'''|1.{cnita kumfa} for "cellar". Rather dubious tanru. "Cellar" really deserves a lujvo.|Ideas?|
 
16 Jan 2006|''le xarmunje gunstu pe la camgusmis.''|'''.i nenri pa kojna fa le tolci'o je nu pilno kei se xrani cukta kajna'''|1.Left-grouping syntax for what obviously should be right-grouped (using {ke})<br />2. "Old and worn-out" cannot be translated as {tolci'o je nu pilno kei se xrani}, that means "harmed by (old and use)".|'''1. tolci'o je ke nu pilno kei se xrani ke'e ke cukta kajna'''<br />'''2. tolci'o je nunpliselxai ckukajna'''|
 
16 Jan 2006|''skami xanri bo munje krasi''|'''sacki kevna'''|What do matches have to do with a hole? malglico?|'''sakci kevna'''|'''+'''
 
||

Latest revision as of 08:17, 26 September 2014

A class of Lojbanists arbitrarily defined by Nick Nicholas as "anyone who joined Lojban after he left it for his PhD". (i.e. 1994)

  • nitcion:
    • Thanks, Jay! :-) But I do think there is a legitimate distinction to be drawn between the sundry waves of Lojbanists, particularly in terms of social dynamics.