MEX grammar proposal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Gleki moveu a página mEX grammar proposal para MEX grammar proposal através de um redirecionamento) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Current grammar: === | === Current grammar: === | ||
<pre> | |||
sumti-6 <- ... / lerfu-string !MOI# BOI#? / (LAhE# / NAhE# BO#) relative-clauses? sumti LUhU#? /... | sumti-6 <- ... / lerfu-string !MOI# BOI#? / (LAhE# / NAhE# BO#) relative-clauses? sumti LUhU#? /... | ||
Line 40: | Line 37: | ||
joik <- SE#? JOI# NAI#? / interval / GAhO# interval GAhO# | joik <- SE#? JOI# NAI#? / interval / GAhO# interval GAhO# | ||
</pre> | |||
=== Proposed grammar: === | === Proposed grammar: === | ||
<pre> | |||
sumti-6 <- ... / !tag !selbri lerfu-string BOI#? / !tag !selbri (LAhE# / NAhE# BO#) relative-clauses? sumti LUhU#? / ... | sumti-6 <- ... / !tag !selbri lerfu-string BOI#? / !tag !selbri (LAhE# / NAhE# BO#) relative-clauses? sumti LUhU#? / ... | ||
Line 66: | Line 60: | ||
operator <- SE# operator / NAhE# operator / MAhO# mex TEhU#? / NAhU# selbri TEhU#? / VUhU# / JOhI# / joik-jek | operator <- SE# operator / NAhE# operator / MAhO# mex TEhU#? / NAhU# selbri TEhU#? / VUhU# / JOhI# / joik-jek | ||
</pre> | |||
=== Rationale === | === Rationale === | ||
It makes sense to unify conjunctions with operators because conjunctions | It makes sense to unify conjunctions with operators because conjunctions <u>are</u> binary operators. Everything else basicaly follows from that. | ||
There is more freedom for "quantifier", "mex MOI", "mex ROI", "mex-2 MAI" and "XI mex-2". | There is more freedom for "quantifier", "mex MOI", "mex ROI", "mex-2 MAI" and "XI mex-2". |
Latest revision as of 09:29, 13 August 2015
Current grammar:
sumti-6 <- ... / lerfu-string !MOI# BOI#? / (LAhE# / NAhE# BO#) relative-clauses? sumti LUhU#? /... tanru-unit-2 <- ... / ME# (sumti / lerfu-string) MEhU#? MOI#? / (number / lerfu-string) MOI# / NUhA# mex-operator / ... interval-property <- number ROI# NAI#? / ... free <- ... / (number / lerfu-string) MAI# / XI# (number BOI# / lerfu-string BOI# / VEI# mex VEhO#?) quantifier <- number !MOI# BOI#? / VEI# mex VEhO#? mex <- mex-1 (operator mex-1)* / FUhA# rp-expression mex-1 <- mex-2 (BIhE# operator mex-1)? mex-2 <- operand / PEhO#? operator mex-2+ KUhE#? rp-expression <- operand (rp-expression operator)* operator <- operator-1 (joik-jek operator-1 / joik stag? KE# operator KEhE#?)* operator-1 <- operator-2 / guhek operator-1 gik operator-2 / operator-2 (jek / joik) stag? BO# operator-1 operator-2 <- mex-operator / KE# operator KEhE#? mex-operator <- SE# mex-operator / NAhE# mex-operator / MAhO# mex TEhU#? / NAhU# selbri TEhU#? / VUhU# operand <- operand-1 (joik-ek stag? KE# operand KEhE#?)? operand-1 <- operand-2 (joik-ek operand-2)* operand-2 <- operand-3 (joik-ek stag? BO# operand-2)? operand-3 <- quantifier / lerfu-string !MOI# BOI#? / NIhE# selbri TEhU#? / MOhE# sumti TEhU#? / JOhI# mex-2+ TEhU#? / gek operand gik operand-3 / (LAhE# / NAhE# BO#) operand LUhU#? joik <- SE#? JOI# NAI#? / interval / GAhO# interval GAhO#
Proposed grammar:
sumti-6 <- ... / !tag !selbri lerfu-string BOI#? / !tag !selbri (LAhE# / NAhE# BO#) relative-clauses? sumti LUhU#? / ... tanru-unit-2 <- ... / ME# (sumti / mex) MEhU#? MOI#? / mex MOI# / NUhA# operator / ... interval-property <- mex ROI# NAI#? / ... free <- ... / mex-2 MAI# / XI# mex-2 quantifier <- !selbri !sumti-6 mex mex <- mex-1 (operator mex-1)* mex-1 <- mex-2 (operator stag? BO# mex-1)? mex-2 <- number BOI#? / lerfu-string BOI#? / VEI# mex VEhO#? / NIhE# selbri TEhU#? / MOhE# sumti TEhU#? / gek mex gik mex-2 / (LAhE# / NAhE# BO#) mex LUhU#? / PEhO# operator mex+ KUhE#? / FUhA# rp-expression rp-expression <- mex (rp-expression operator)* operator <- SE# operator / NAhE# operator / MAhO# mex TEhU#? / NAhU# selbri TEhU#? / VUhU# / JOhI# / joik-jek
Rationale
It makes sense to unify conjunctions with operators because conjunctions are binary operators. Everything else basicaly follows from that.
There is more freedom for "quantifier", "mex MOI", "mex ROI", "mex-2 MAI" and "XI mex-2".