# BPFK gismu Proposal: jarco

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Posted by xorxes on Thu 10 of Feb., 2005 22:52 GMT posts: 1912

Why not a non-fancy place structure for {jarco}: "x1 shows x2 to x3", so we can say things like:

mi le cukta cu lebna la djan gi'e jarco la susan gi'e dunda la alis "I took the book from John, showed it to Susan, and gave it to Alice."

mu'o mi'e xorxes

Score: 0.00 Vote:
1 2 3 4 5
top of page

Posted by Anonymous on Sat 12 of Feb., 2005 01:26 GMT

On Thursday 10 February 2005 17:52, [email protected] wrote: > Re: BPFK gismu Proposal: jarco > > Why not a non-fancy place structure for {jarco}: > "x1 shows x2 to x3", so we can say things like: > > mi le cukta cu lebna la djan gi'e jarco la susan gi'e dunda la alis > "I took the book from John, showed it to Susan, and gave it to Alice."

I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" and "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo.

phma -- lo nu punji lo sovda be lo cipnrkuku kukuku zvati lo zdani be lo na'e cipnrkuku kuku

Score: 0.00 Vote:
1 2 3 4 5
top of page

Posted by Anonymous on Sat 12 of Feb., 2005 01:26 GMT

On Thursday 10 February 2005 17:52, [email protected] wrote: > Re: BPFK gismu Proposal: jarco > > Why not a non-fancy place structure for {jarco}: > "x1 shows x2 to x3", so we can say things like: > > mi le cukta cu lebna la djan gi'e jarco la susan gi'e dunda la alis > "I took the book from John, showed it to Susan, and gave it to Alice."

I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" and "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo.

phma -- lo nu punji lo sovda be lo cipnrkuku kukuku zvati lo zdani be lo na'e cipnrkuku kuku

Score: 0.00 Vote:
1 2 3 4 5
top of page

rlpowellPosted by rlpowell on Sat 12 of Feb., 2005 05:00 GMT posts: 14214

On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Thursday 10 February 2005 17:52, [email protected] wrote: > > Re: BPFK gismu Proposal: jarco > > > > Why not a non-fancy place structure for {jarco}: "x1 shows x2 to > > x3", so we can say things like: > > > > mi le cukta cu lebna la djan gi'e jarco la susan gi'e dunda la > > alis "I took the book from John, showed it to Susan, and gave > > it to Alice." > > I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" and > "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo.

+1

-Robin

-- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/

Score: 0.00 Vote:
1 2 3 4 5
top of page

Posted by xorxes on Sat 12 of Feb., 2005 17:03 GMT posts: 1912

> > mi le cukta cu lebna la djan gi'e jarco la susan gi'e dunda la alis > > "I took the book from John, showed it to Susan, and gave it to Alice." > > I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" and "x1 shows > his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo.

The definition of {dunda} includes the comment: "x2 may be a specific object, a commodity (mass), an event, or a property" and {lebna} has "x2 (object/property)", so for {jarco} a property in x2 would not be especially odd, as long as it is not restricted to properties only.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''__ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com

Score: 0.00 Vote:
1 2 3 4 5
top of page

Posted by Anonymous on Sat 12 of Feb., 2005 17:03 GMT

On Friday 11 February 2005 23:24, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" and > > "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo. > > +1

ki'a? -- li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

Score: 0.00 Vote:
1 2 3 4 5
top of page

Posted by xorxes on Sat 12 of Feb., 2005 17:04 GMT posts: 1912

> On Friday 11 February 2005 23:24, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > > I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" and > > > "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo. > > > > +1 > > ki'a?

That's a Cowanism (at least I know it as a Cowanism) for "I agree" or "add my one vote for that".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''__ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

Score: 0.00 Vote:
1 2 3 4 5
top of page

rlpowellPosted by rlpowell on Sat 12 of Feb., 2005 19:35 GMT posts: 14214

On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 11:07:42AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Friday 11 February 2005 23:24, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > > I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" > > > and "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo. > > > > +1 > > ki'a?

+1 == "I agree, but don't want to waste people's e-mail space by

typing the whole thing out".

-Robin

-- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/

Score: 0.00 Vote:
1 2 3 4 5
top of page

Posted by Anonymous on Sat 12 of Feb., 2005 20:32 GMT

On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 11:31 -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: >On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 11:07:42AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: >> On Friday 11 February 2005 23:24, Robin Lee Powell wrote: >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: >> > > I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" >> > > and "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo. >> > >> > +1 >> >> ki'a? > >+1 == "I agree, but don't want to waste people's e-mail space by >typing the whole thing out".

..ie is too long?

mu'omi'elabancus

Score: 0.00 Vote:
1 2 3 4 5
top of page

rlpowellPosted by rlpowell on Sat 12 of Feb., 2005 20:32 GMT posts: 14214

On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 12:08:00PM -0800, Theodore Reed wrote: > On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 11:31 -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 11:07:42AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > >> On Friday 11 February 2005 23:24, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > >> > > I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to > >> > > x3" and "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with > >> > > lujvo. > >> > > >> > +1 > >> > >> ki'a? > > > >+1 == "I agree, but don't want to waste people's e-mail space by > >typing the whole thing out". > > .ie is too long?

Forgot.

-Robin