View source for Robin's Palm Writings: Math - The RPN Nesting Problem

==  MOVED TO: ==

http://teddyb.org/robin/tiki-index.php?page=Lojban%2C+Math%2C+mekso%2C+and+bridi+cmaci&amp;no_bl=y

Robin's Palm Writings: Category: misc

Navigation: [[Robin's Palm Writings: misc|misc Index]] [[Robin's Palm Writings|Robin's Palm Writings Top-Level Index]]  

-is: mi klama gi'ai nu le do klama gi'ai nu le cabna == le nu mi klama kei le nu do klama kei cabna OR	== le nu do klama le nu mi klama kei kei cabna

-with regular RPN, this is solved by strict place structure requirements

-no Lojban solution has yet presented itself

-ex:

(3 (1 1 2 +) 4 [2 5 +) (2 7 3 *) +) *)

-hell, just try: 1 7 (2 5 3 +) 4 *

-the problem may *always* be insoluble with variable numbers of args...  Yeah, pretty sure.  Without parens or other tricks, anyways

-we could mark how many arguments we're consuming.  Parseable?  Certainly parseable if we set a finite limit.  Getting a bit pointless?

-just use the ".i le ni'ai go'i" trick, but that gets complicated with multiple args

-argument consumption markers

-pretend zilsumji takes inf args, and last arg is always result

-(1 2 (3 4 5 +) 6 7)+ 8 + 9 neg +

-have words for 0 (gi'ai), 1 (gi'au), 2 (gi'oi) and addt'l (xei), and all (gi'ui)

-li pa li re li ci li vo li mu zilsumji gi'oi xei ni'ai le li xa li ze zilsumji gi'ui ni'ai le li bi zilsumji gi'ai ni'ai le li so fatne? gi'au ni'ai le zilsumji gi'oi ni'ai le

-seems to work

-a bit clumsy, but no worse than 2 args required

Old Notes

-NU reverser? helps with RPN, also of general utility: mi klama lo nu gi'ai cabna do klama lo nu gi'ai

-what it does is "everything preceding goes in the NU just declared"

-this allows RPN: li'ai li pa li pa ziljmina li'ai gi'ai li pa ziljmina

-li pa li pa selsumji le ni gi'ai li pa selsumji le ni gi'ai

-need some clarity in "everything".   probably "sentence". jcowan mentioned the gua!spi's version is like .i, which is prbably almost TRT

-NU uses subsentence, which is sentence + optional prenex

-it gets used in tanru-unit, which seems like it won't work here

- terms (or whatever's at the front of sentence) = ... / subsentence LE? tanru-unit(??) NU gi'ai

- BOGGLE: could just allow multiple selbri, if 2nd and up start with NU

-no, bad lookahead on say "broda nu lo brode"

-kpried's gi'ai:

-li pa li pa te sumji gi'ai nu'ui le = le nu'ui li ...

-li pa li pa te sumji gi'ai le = le sumji be ... (first unfilled place)

-broda gau gi'ai lo brode = lo jai gau broda cu brode