sAE

From Lojban
Revision as of 14:49, 10 June 2014 by Gleki (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notes in square brackets of whether each feature is possible in Lojban.

Haspelmath (2001) lists further features characteristic of European languages (but also found elsewhere):

  1. verb-initial order in yes/no questions; [optionally possible in Lojban]
  2. comparative inflection of adjectives (e.g. English bigger); [optionally possible in Lojban]
  3. conjunction A, B and C; [no, needs extra {ke ... ke'e} brackets for nesting, the default is "A and B and C"]
  4. syncretism of comitative and instrumental cases (e.g. English with my friends vs. with a knife); [terrible polysemy, but comitative is vague enough to be used instead of instrumental, so yes, possible]
  5. suppletivism in second vs. two; [of course not, it's stupid and has mostly historical explanations]
  6. no distinction between alienable (e.g. legal property) and inalienable (e.g. body part) possession; [possible with {pe}]
  7. no distinction between inclusive and exclusive first-person plural pronouns ("we and you" vs."we and not you"); [not possible yet, always distinguishable, probably the definition of SAE "we" should be "I and other people, optionally including the listener". {za'u mi} is a possible solution although doubted by some]
  8. no productive usage of reduplication; [yes, not used]
  9. topic and focus expressed by intonation and word order; [possilbe with intonation; possible by word order, which is probably an universal]
  10. word order subject–verb–object; [yes, by default]
  11. only one gerund, preference for finite subordinate clauses; [well, one gerund is definitely possible]
  12. specific "neither-nor" construction; [not very specific, a part of a neat conjunctive system]
  13. phrasal adverbs (e.g. English already, still, not yet); [can be seen as advebrs]
  14. tendency towards replacement of past tense by the perfect.~ [pragmatically possible, but only as a tendency, not as a rule]